Support as nominator — JakeWartenberg 02:11, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Oppose grainy at full resolution Sasata (talk) 08:13, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Support - historic, great restoration. High enc. The graininess at full size is a property of the original print, not something that anyone at WP has induced or can get rid of. At least it means we're not losing any data - the image is higher resolution than the original print. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 09:18, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Comment recusing from supporting or opposing because I coached the nominator in this restoration, but Vanderdecken is correct about the photochrom process. DurovaCharge! 00:39, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
SupportJimGreeid (talk) 03:27, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
SupportGerardM (talk) 23:21, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
Support - High EV and historic photograph. VX!~~~ 04:59, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Support Nice restoration, historic and high EV. Here are the coordinates for where the picture was taken, which was looking to the west-northwest: Script error: No such module "Coordinates". --Chasingsol(talk) 09:30, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Comment. Updated the EXIF information with the coordinates and added the {{location}} template. --Chasingsol(talk) 19:03, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Promoted File:Quays Waterford2.jpgMER-C 02:25, 19 February 2009 (UTC)