Support as nominatorLestath 19:41, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Support I like it, sharp, clear, good contrast with the background - my only problem with it is that in thumb form it looks a bit odd, the center figure being difficult to set apart from the rest - maybe I just to need to put on my glasses o.0: . Cheers. --Mad Tinman 19:54, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Neutral untill authenticity concerns are answered. --Mad TinmanTC 19:28, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Question is this object a copy and not an original? This diminishes its encyclopedic value. Jeff Dahl (Talk • contribs) 21:57, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
The image page itself seems to say that it's a copy. Spikebrennan 02:36, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Neutral, high quality picture, but neutral until the above question has been answered. --Aqwis 22:42, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Oppose per jjron and Spikebrennan. --Aqwis 14:10, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Conditional support The authenticity must be verified.--HereToHelp 23:45, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Oppose mainly on encyclopaedic grounds. I don't think the seal is so much as mentioned in the article (much less described), and the seal seems entirely irrelevant to the section it's in, so I don't see what encyclopaedic value it is adding. OK for Commons, but needs encyclopaedic value here. --jjron 00:36, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Comment. The dark background is distracting-- why not use image editing to replace it with white? Spikebrennan 02:36, 2 November 2007 (UTC)