Support as nominator --Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:36, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Oppose sorry, I just don't think it adds enough to the article, if it was removed I don't see how the readers understanding of the topic would be inhibited. Guest9999 (talk) 07:52, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Weak Support Whilst I don't see any convincing argument for the image's usage in Girl, I have placed it in Portuguese people#General_traits where it makes a fairly fitting illustration for the article text. Weak support because the technicals aren't perfect by present standards; There is some noise and softness. Noodle snacks (talk) 13:59, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Oppose - there is nothing exceptional in this snapshot.--Avala (talk) 00:31, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
Oppose per Avala and Guest9999. Amphy (talk) 06:32, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
Support based on its use in Portuguese people primarily, as I agree that a photo of a single girl is going to struggle to illustrate girl. It is a good portrait. Diliff | (Talk)(Contribs) 15:06, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
Oppose All it really illustrates on the Portuguese page is brown hair and eyes. A decent portrait, but not outstanding enough to be a FP based on its limited EV. --Leivick (talk) 21:43, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
Support A good portrait, though I would tweak the levels a bit. --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 00:22, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Little EV in Portuguese people. Maybe if you had a shot of her with her family so we could see what Portuguese men and women of different ages look like. But a shoulders-up shot of a young girl just doesn't do enough to illustrate a whole ethnic group. Makeemlighter (talk) 06:41, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Oppose As said earlier, nothing exceptional here. -- mcshadyplTC 01:34, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Extremely poor EV as well having poor composition. Jerry teps (talk) 23:05, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Not promoted . --John254 02:04, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
