Support as conominator — JakeWartenberg 03:22, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Support as conominatorDurovaCharge! 03:25, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Weak Support Not terribly exciting, but great historical value. Fletcher (talk) 03:42, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Weak Oppose I appreciate the historical value of this video. And for someone doing in-depth research on Ellis Island and immigration, it might be valuable. But for anyone else, I just don't think this has much EV. It just shows too little of the whole Ellis Island immigration process. Makeemlighter (talk) 03:33, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Good historical value, but a missed opportunity for restoration. Many frames show noticeable degradation, the black level is off, frames jitter back and forth, and the exposure level is inconsistent. Combined, it gives the video a "raw" feel that falls short of the high technical standard and the best work criteria. Sorry, I know how time-consuming video editing is. Wronkiew (talk) 03:41, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Support meets all eight criteria, though criteria 1 is as an exception in the technical quality but which is eaily offset by the historical nature which of the video. Gnangarra 03:57, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Weak, Weak Oppose Quite historic, but as Wronkiew says, the quality just isn't there. SpencerT♦C 22:10, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Weak oppose per above. Quality is no where near at FP, but very great historic value. (So it seems half and half) Maybe Valued pictures? Cheers ZooFari 04:39, 24 February 2009 (UTC)