Wiki143:Articles for deletion/The Disclosure Project NPC Conference

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect. Interested editor may merge from history as warranted. Xoloz 17:22, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

The Disclosure Project NPC Conference

Poorly written, badly sourced tripe... absolutely no notably anywhere on the page--didn't see much of any sort anywhere, conferences are notoriously NOT notable, will change if evidence given on page... and by evidence, I do NOT mean a local news network running a segment, see talk page for notability questions —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kmaguir1 (talk • contribs) .

• Merge to Disclosure Project - coverage is realy about that rather than the conference. -- Whpq 16:28, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, Disclosure Project already has much more on the subject. Nothing to merge if we disregard the link farm. Weregerbil 14:31, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep The conference is notable, since it was a first high-profile washington based apperance of the disclosure project. The BBC report [1] is a good source, that also testifies about notability. It is not just ANY press conference, it is a conference that is a huge event for the UFO comunity. I bumped on the conference video and imediately checked background on wikipedia, and to my surprise, the article that was there is being considered for deletion. Now, the fact that one can find information on wikipedia about it was great, and deleting it would mean that some people will be denied information about this event. Wiki is not a paper encyclopedia. In short, the conference is a notable event because it is important to the UFO community (btw, i am extremely skeptical to the UFO issue, just as most people, but the conference and the campagn is an event in itself). 137.205.132.170 10:30, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Also, further evidence of notability - this is CNN coverage [2]. So, the conference was newsworthy, by wiki criteria, it should be included! 137.205.132.170 10:55, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

• keep, nom did not bother to read the talk page.--Striver 13:52, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.