Wiki143:Articles for deletion/Syllable (operating system)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 03:47, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Syllable (operating system)

Given a Template:Tl which was removed without comment. As noted there, no claim to notability or satifsying our guidelines for inclusion of software.
brenneman^{T}{L} 06:25, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

• Keep, about a thousand or so references on Google, coverage in a notable print magazine (Linux Format), and some longevity. Lankiveil 11:35, 20 March 2006 (UTC).
• Keep. As noted, Linux Format has covered this OS. I can't comment on how many people use it or are on its mailing list(s), but I think this is notable enough to warrant an entry. Ciaran H 11:54, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Looks to be notable enough to have an article. Jude (talk,contribs,email) 12:32, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: I went to the Linux Format website and was unable to penetrate their arcane search system fully. However I was able to discover that not only has it been featured on the Cover CD several times, it is due to be featured in the upcoming issue (April 2006). If someone could get hold of a reference for that and add it to the article, this would probably help a great deal. HTH HAND —Phil | Talk 13:28, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Notable enough to keep. Also, the project is active. --Kaze0010 21:10, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Moderately notable and useful software Bobby P. Smith Sr. Jr. 22:13, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• I'd like to see more information put into the article to support these claims. - brenneman^{L} 00:38, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
• See the Syllable forums for pics of the LXF article on the subject —This unsigned comment was added by 217.206.224.221 (talk • contribs) .
• Keep Notable enough, although it needs this asserted - I'll try and take a look at it, later. --Fuzzie (talk) 00:49, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.