Wiki143:Articles for deletion/Stephen Colduck

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Angr/talk 10:57, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Stephen Colduck

Non-notable, vanity-ish. Being a radio news guy on a minor community college station is not really notable. It's just a job. DanielCD 01:43, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Just not notable. --DanielCD 01:43, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. FloNight 01:49, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Nice work on the article. Now write an article on the employee at the Wendy's down the street so it can get *cough*deleted*cough* like this one. Royboycrashfan File:Flag of Texas.svg 02:12, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete - CSD A7: Anyone can get a spot on their college's radio station if they want to, doesn't meet WP:BIO --lightdarkness ^(talk) 02:41, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: Suggest author write an article about the station. It'll probably be sent to AfD, but I support the keeping of articles about continuously broadcasting stations of any size. Staffers are usually nn tho. — Adrian~enwiki (talk) 03:34, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn. --Terence Ong 03:56, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Deletenon notable. Deckiller 03:58, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Gimme a break. dbtfz^talk 04:03, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, totally embarassing VanityDJCruft. Deiz 04:14, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete', vanity, non notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vercalos (talk • contribs) 2006-03-04 20:18:12
• Delete as non-notable. —-- That Guy, From That Show! ^(talk) 2006-03-05 05:23Z
• Delete the only use of this article appears to be self promotion Kyle sb 09:55, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom
• Delete per nom. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 14:57, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. - Tangotango 16:17, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Francisco Valverde 18:32, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. -- Alpha269 16:05, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
• Note: uncontroversial deletions like this one are good candidates for the Wikipedia:Proposed deletion process currently being tested out. Consider using that simpler process for the next similar nomination. -- King of Hearts | (talk) 00:09, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.