Wiki143:Articles for deletion/Social Security Disability Insurance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete both pages as copyvio, with no redirect per Mukdderat's point. Future non-copyvio versions are encouraged and should not have this AFD held against them. Turnstep 14:28, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Social Security Disability Insurance

Afd - dupe of Social_security_disability_insurance Rmcii 05:34, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

• Copyvio and possible spamvertisement Before someone suggests being bold and doing a simple redirect, both Social Security Disability Insurance and Social_security_disability_insurance are copyvios from an About.com Q&A session with Don Keck of Allsup.com, which coincidentally is the first external link in the article. By content, the articles are un-encyclopedic; a form of FAQ/How To guide rather than a neutral topical reference article. Suggest deleting both and redirecting to Social Security (United States). Thatcher131 06:45, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete both as copyvio. Unless someone posts a substantially altered article in the next 5 days that isn't a cut & paste job...--Isotope23 19:10, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Social Security (United States). MCB 04:46, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete. Copyvio --Strothra 05:15, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Social Security (United States), per Thatcher131 and MCB; allow the article to be recreated if/when done so without copyrighted information. -AED 03:32, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete, no redirect: the suggested targed says not a single word on the topic, so, in fact the redirect will be confusing. What is more, the (deleted) article tries to draw a distinction. Mukadderat 17:43, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - of no interest outside the USA, and not much inside. - Runcorn 22:00, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.