Wiki143:Articles for deletion/Sith Apprentice

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WjBscribe 17:06, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Sith Apprentice

Template:La – (View log)

YouTube movie, not notable, no references (bar 1 or 2 "external links") Dalejenkins 08:54, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

• Delete This has nothing to do with YouTube. YouTube videos don't get entries in IMDB. Having said that, the article does not sufficiently state why this is notable. You should be aware that not all videos distributed over the Internet are just YouTube videos and some Star Wars and Star Trek fan movies have actually attracted enough attention to be notable. This isn't one of them unless better references are given. Keep Notability has been properly asserted now per WP:N and WP:RS. MartinDK 09:02, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - "won the Audience Choice Award in the Lucasfilm-sponsored 2005 Official Star Wars Fan Film Awards" gives it sufficient notability to merit inclusion (although it could certainly do with a lot more references). _└ ^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 10:02, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as per Martin and Dale. Bravedog 19:12, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per UkPaolo. TheRealFennShysa 15:46, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - Winning the award makes it a keeper in my books, winning an official competition seems notable especially in the world where there are a lot of these fan movies out there. Ben W Bell talk 07:45, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete -i agree with dalejenkins and martinDK80.43.94.93 20:27, 8 May 2007 (UTC)— 80.43.94.93 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
• Keep - I've rewritten the article somewhat to include references, since this film easily satisfies WP:WEB and any notability concerns by virtue of the film's award from a Lucasfilm-endorsed contest, the press coverage, and the contributions of Lowell Cunningham. MikeWazowski 05:17, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per above. -LtNOWIS 11:28, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.