Wiki143:Articles for deletion/Search Engine Optimization Tips

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete as copyvio. If someone wants to make a redirect, go for it, but there's nothing linking to this page. howcheng {chat} 19:29, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Search Engine Optimization Tips

Not exactly a CSD so: merge with Search engine optimization or delete I'd say are the only things that make sense for this. gren グレン ^? 01:30, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

• Merge per nom. Tom Harrison ^Talk 01:47, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
• Merge, as both articles are extremely relevant. Sycthos^Talk 02:36, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
• Merge makes sense; AfD not required for this Segv11 ^{(talk/contribs)} 03:32, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
• Merge per nom -- That Guy, From That Show! 03:57, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete there is nothing in this article that is actually worth merging with Search engine optimization. Note that Wikipedia is not a how-to guide. --Bachrach44 04:21, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

• If there is no useful content that can be merged, wouldn't a redirect be more appropriate than deletion? Movementarian (Talk) 11:01, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

• Redirect good call. --Bachrach44 01:27, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

• Redirect Search engine optimization is more formal and complete. -- MisterHand 16:47, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
• Merge, though there really isn't much to merge. Aapo Laitinen 21:04, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
• Merge Most of what's here is speculative so it should be mostly deleted. It would be worthwhile to cite the public guidelines for webmasters provided Google, Yahoo and MSN. Jehochman 23:11, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and don't forget to include the bit on adding links to your site to every single article in Wikipedia, an important part of the SEO process :-) Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] File:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg AfD? 13:35, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
• Merge per above. —nihon 04:04, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
• comment an anon IP is now claiming that the article is copyrighted. I'm deleting the link since it counts as spam (not the first time either), but it's something to keep in mind. --Bachrach44 20:59, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
• Merge. Preaky 21:38, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
• comment the author is now claiming that the information is copyrighted, and demanding that his webpage and credit be maintained on the page. The information does appear to come from here, so at this point I'm going to suggest that since the info is copyrighted, we can't even use it in a merge, and should just delete the page and replace it with a redirect to Search engine optimization. --Bachrach44 01:43, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.