Wiki143:Articles for deletion/San Diego Freeway

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Interstate 405 (California). –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 20:26, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

San Diego Freeway

Template:La (delete) – (View log)

This article is entirely covered in Interstate 405 (California) and Interstate 5 (California), 75% is lists - against WP policies, 25% is a poorly written route description and history. Rschen7754 (T C) 07:02, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. Redundant to I-405 and I-5. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 07:05, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
• Delete As per above. ThePointblank (talk) 07:05, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
• Redirect to Interstate 405 (California), with a disambiguation link at the top for I-5. Everything worth keeping is already in the I-405 article, so there's nothing to merge. --NE2 10:24, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, yeah, this is totally redundant. CL — 12:11, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
• Redirect per NE2. Outright deletion is not necessary since this is a likely search term. --Polaron | Talk 13:17, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
• Redirect per NE2, Polaron to avoid future creation of a new article as suggested by a post-deletion search results page. Sswonk (talk) 13:19, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Possibly WP:SALT to prevent future recreation. coccyx bloccyx_(toccyx) 19:30, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
• Redirect per NE2, don't delete, to preserve the history, but protect from being changed back into an article. Expected search term. 23skidoo (talk) 19:34, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - Per reasons above. ~~ This page was edited by ĈĠ 20:20, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
• Redirect per NE2, Polaron - alternate name for a freeway (add dab note on top of the page)  — master son^{T - C} 22:42, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
• Outright and literally delete is unneccessairly. But this page have to either subpont to I-405 (CA) or turn/convert into disab page. San Diego Fwy is a official highway take full part of I-405 and becoems an I-5 in Orange County.--FRWY 22:44, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
• Redirect per NE2. However I fail to see how this article is different from Hollywood Freeway, Ventura Freeway amongst many others. Where is the line drawn? Discussion started at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Roads Dave (talk) 22:45, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment - perhaps there is no line and these should be made redirects, too. However isn't the Ventura Freeway just that - no number? Hollywood Freeway I think is Highway 101 so it could be renamed. 23skidoo (talk) 05:59, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
• I agree with Dave. Santa Ana and Golden State Freeway is a differ story.--FRWY 22:55, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per Rschen & NE2 Admrboltz (talk) 00:23, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Since I oppose a deletion, I think you have the wrong name. --NE2 02:22, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
    • Thats what I get for editing from work. Struck. --Admrboltz (talk) 03:05, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
• Keep for the same reason separate articles exist for Interstate 95 in New York, Interstate 295 (New York) the Cross Bronx Expressway, Trans-Manhattan Expressway, Bruckner Expressway and New England Thruway. ----DanTD (talk) 12:19, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
  • But there is none for the Long Island Expressway, Van Wyck Expressway, or Whitestone Expressway, to name a few. (All of those have a part that's not the Interstate they redirect to, just like the San Diego Freeway.) —NE2 16:08, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 00:58, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 00:58, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
• Redirect per NE2, et al. I can't understand why such a prominent name for a highway would be proposed for deletion. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 01:10, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
• Still have to go through normal AFD, it's Wiki's rule. Even if it is a subpoint, this is to discuss with contributors. It don't have to be totally delete, it can turn into a #REDIRECT [[]]. Subpoint is this cheap.--FRWY 01:11, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.