Wiki143:Articles for deletion/Republican Party Nominee
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 8 July 2005 19:43 (UTC)
Republican Party Nominee
Unnecessary article. MisfitToys 23:03, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep No reason to delete it. Can be expanded to discuss some history... --Wolf530 00:41, May 21, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Sorry... we would have accepted List of Republican Party presidential nominees... if you had written one. Dcarrano July 3, 2005 02:45 (UTC)
- Delete, borderline dicdef, and this topic's already covered in the various election articles, e.g. U.S. presidential election, 2008. --Idont Havaname 3 July 2005 03:51 (UTC)
- Delete no use --IncMan July 3, 2005 04:13 (UTC)
- Delete or Merge with Republican Party or another relevant article. -SocratesJedi | Talk 3 July 2005 04:25 (UTC)
- Delete, because I see no way this could be turned into a useful article. It should be obvious to many people, even if they have not heard of the "Republican Party" that a "Republican Party Nominee" is someone nominated by/for the "Republican Party." As Idont havaname said, it is a borderline dicdef. Ben Babcock 3 July 2005 05:30 (UTC)
- Delete: It is a dicdef, aside from completely obvious. --Alex12 3 3 July 2005 09:37 (UTC)
- Delete dicdef. — Chameleon 3 July 2005 16:39 (UTC)
- Delete --Yooden
- Delete dicdef. JamesBurns 4 July 2005 00:41 (UTC)
- Delete dicdef. If this were allowed to remain, wikipedia would need Democratic Party Nominee, Libertarian Party Nominee, Labour Party Nominee/candidate etc, ad infinitum. --WCFrancis 4 July 2005 06:07 (UTC)
- Delete, although I'd usually vote for something valid to be expanded rather than deleted... I can't see much scope for this one... Oliver Keenan July 4, 2005 22:09 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.