Wiki143:Articles for deletion/Office of Economics, Environmental Analysis and Administration

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. — JIP | Talk 10:22, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

Office of Economics, Environmental Analysis and Administration

Feddle gubmint jibberjabbercruft. Heavy use of the word 'We' makes me think this was cut & pasted (or hacked) by a govco drone with too much time on his hands. Viva Liberty! Delete The Government! Eddie.willers 22:49, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

• Keep and Clean up Has been tagged for clean up for a year. I am going to add it to my to do list and remove first person point of view. Long live big government! Psy guy ^(talk) 22:58, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Oh puhleeeze! The fact that it has been tagged for clean up for this long means that either it's of no interest or no one with sufficient knowledge has stepped forward to undertake the cleanup. Additionally, the article suffers from obscurity in that it fails to sufficiently explain the position within the federal superstructure of this particular office. If that wasn't enough, since when did minor collections of govco drones become notable?? What has this department achieved that merits an encyclopaedic article? Answers on a post card please... Eddie.willers 23:05, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and cleanup, government agencies are valid topics. User:Zoe|^(talk) 00:05, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
• I have wikified and de-waffled it somethat, and cleared out the "we"'s. Some government office may have a policy of describing themselves on Wikipedia. Anthony Appleyard 08:20, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and that was after you de-waffled it. Boy this article needs some pictures, there's nothing much else going on in there, is there? Alf ^melmac 20:46, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. These are reasons to cleanup, not delete. ··gracefool |☺ 18:17, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.