Wiki143:Articles for deletion/O Pioneers Split 10"

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to band. If the band article gets deleted, the redirect will go as well. IF the band is notable though, this is a reasonable search term, but not a notable enough subject for a separate article. Fram (talk) 09:16, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

O Pioneers Split 10"

Template:La – (View log)

Delete unsourced article about an album by two groups - one redlinked and probably nn, fails WP:MUSIC Carlossuarez46 (talk) 00:56, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

• It's not notable, so I'd just say redirect it to the bluelinked band, but as Carlos said, I seriously doubt the band is notable, and a bit of searching would probably prove that. I (talk) 02:07, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect: To Bomb the Music Industry!. Non-notable album. - Rjd0060 (talk) 05:11, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, because indie music is really, really lame and so is the culture that surrounds it. No, seriously, it's unverifiable with 4 Google hits. Enough said.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 05:49, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
• Do Not Delete: It's a real split. You can find it at www.quoteunquoterecords.com under the Albums section. It's legit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.60.173.215 (talk) 21:23, 24 November 2007 (UTC)— 24.60.173.215 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.