Wiki143:Articles for deletion/NitroPDF

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Anything else doesn't need AFD (i.e. go ahead and cleanup/move as appropriate). Petros471 19:18, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

NitroPDF

Advertising of nonnotable product NawlinWiki 20:39, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

• Keep, clean up, and move to Nitro PDF The product is almost certainly notable. The article contains reviews from "reliable sources," including CNET. "NitroPDF" gets 13,100 Google hits (and the top hits all refer to this product), but "Nitro PDF" gets 488 THOUSAND HITS (and, again, every one of the top hits refers to the product in question). However, the article absolutely reads like an advertisement, and I don't think a "history" section is necessary. -- Kicking222 21:40, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

This AfD is being relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!
bainer (talk) 14:32, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

• Keep and cleanup per Kicking222. Seems that as a product it is notable enough to pass, and has been reviewed by major trade publications. Smerdis of Tlön 15:21, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Strong keep, if cleaned up per above opinions Xyrael ^T 16:03, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and cleanup - very notable software. —Mets501^talk 23:49, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.