Wiki143:Articles for deletion/Lu sin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. It could possibly be a corrupted pronunciation of Lu Xun, but I'm unsure. And Lu Xun doesn't seem to have appeared in Romance of the Three Kingdoms. Kimchi.sg 06:22, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Lu sin

Article says it's for a fictional chraracter, but no hint is given as to where the character is from. From a book? A movie? A computer game? Someone's unpublished work? Which book/movie/computer game? We have no way of knowing, and thus no way of judging whether this is a notable character or not. A Google search turned up nothing that looked like the same character. So I have to say this is non-notable unless/until I'm shown otherwise. TexasAndroid 19:13, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

• From Romance of the Three Kingdoms, probably, given the chain of internal links. Uncle G 19:35, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• Ohconfucius he say keep ;-) Ohconfucius 02:26, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Why? Can you cite a source confirming that this is indeed a RotTK character? Uncle G 23:44, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:FICT, which states "Major and notable minor characters ... in a work of fiction should be covered within the article on that work of fiction." --Satori Son 16:40, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Many of the characters in Romance of the Three Kingdoms have their own articles, not least because there are a lot of them and a lot to write about them. (It's a pretty major work of fiction.) The question is not whether the character warrants xyr own article or not. It's whether this actually is a character at all. I've searched, and have yet to find a RottTK character by this name, or with this particular biography, in any source. Uncle G 23:44, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
    • Agreed. My opinion, of course, is still delete. --Satori Son 00:12, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.