Wiki143:Articles for deletion/Kirk Sutherland

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep under criterion #1: no editor, including the nominator, recommends deletion of the articles. Mergers are a separate process. (Secondarily, the nominator has been blocked for sockpuppetry.) —C.Fred (talk) 16:36, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Kirk Sutherland

AfDs for this article:

    The given page title was invalid or had an inter-language or inter-wiki prefix.

    It may contain one or more characters that cannot be used in titles.

Added Note: A regular search of any of these turns up very little besides episode guides and ITV (the network the show is on). -- Dodgechris (talk | contribs) 11:15, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

The full list of characters I'm nominating:

  • Kirk Sutherland -- 1 hit on Google, Nearly 8 years on show, high notability asserted, stub class information.
  • Molly Compton -- 0 hits on Google, 3 years on show, high notability asserted, deletion has been considered, currently in storyline.
  • Ryan Connor -- nearly 2 years on show, stub class, small notability asserted, appears on a more recurring basis.
  • Julie Carp -- less than 1 year on show, no notability asserted, appears on a recurring basis.
  • Pam Hobsworth -- Only just joined, small notability asserted, currently appearing.
  • Kelly Crabtree -- 2 hits on Google, 4 years on show, small notability asserted, occasionally appears.
  • Vernon Tomlin -- 2 hits on Google, notability asserted, reguarly appears, leaving show soon.
  • Chesney Battersby-Brown -- 1 hit on Google, 5 years on show, not currently in storyline.
  • Dev Alahan -- 1 hit on Google, long time on show, only ever had 1 real storyline, currently appaers.
  • Carla Connor -- 3 hits on Google, over 1 year on show, needs cititions for verification, small notability, has had numerous storylines.
  • Becky Granger -- 2 hits on Google, 2 years on show, notability asserted, background character in a current storyline.
  • Tina McIntyre -- 3 hits on Google, less than year on show, high notability asserted.
  • Harry Mason -- 2 hits on Google, less than year on show, average notability asserted, leving show soon.
  • Dan Mason -- 2 hits on Google, less than year on show, average notability asserted, leaving show soon.
  • Merge all of them into the same one article.Dodgechris (talk) 12:25, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

What of Kelly Crabtree, Vernon Tomlin, Chesney Battersby-Brown, Dev Alahan, Carla Connor, Becky Granger, Tina McIntyre, Harry Mason and Dan Mason? -- Dodgechris (talk)

I have had no choice but to renominate Carla Connor - she has previously been nominated in 2007, but the article was kept -- Dodgechris (talk)

I am still concerned about Kirk and Molly having their own page -- Dodgechris (talk)

  • Comment - could you choose which articles you're nominating, and finalise your list? You've been nominating, un-nominating and re-nominating different articles for the past five hours, making it very hard to actually put forth an opinion. Frickative 15:29, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. —Frickative 16:01, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Merge them all in the appropriate places, assuming none of them is actually a major character. If it is being asserted that some of them are, then this afd must be split and relisted. DGG (talk) 09:12, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

What shall i do with the rest of the characters on the deletion list? -- Dodgechris (talk)

Keep as a trainwreck. It's quite clear that the nominator hasn't quite decided what should happen to each individual article. Those that stand on its own should not be nominated. Those that should be merged to a list of characters can be dealt with outside of AFD. And if there are any left at the end of the activity, then they can be nominated for AFD then. -- Whpq (talk) 19:26, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

  • Speedy keep. Since merging is not deleting, the nominator is effectively not asking for deletion. There are separate tags and procedures for merges. I'm on lunch break and don't have time to fully unwind the nominations, or I would close it myself. —C.Fred (talk) 17:12, 21 July 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "http://debianws.lexgopc.com/wiki143/index.php?title=Wiki143:Articles_for_deletion/Kirk_Sutherland&oldid=7056227"