Wiki143:Articles for deletion/Johnny Pacar

 :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Bizarre adventure. The AfD is being closed many years later, because it was never properly closed back then, because it was never visible, because it was never transcluded on any of the daily logpages. Technically, it has still been open this whole time.

Nobody else could ever be admitted here, because this door was made only for you. I am now going to shut it. jp×g 07:30, 18 October 2022 (UTC)(non-admin closure)

Johnny Pacar

Template:La – (View AfD

(Template:Find sources AFD)

Irrelevant; shameless vanity page Beckenbauer05 01:00, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Please act in accordance with Wikipedia, and do not remove this flag for deletion until time for debate has been allowed. If you object to my opinion tell me about it. This seems to me to be a vanity page, IMDB offers all of this information about Mr. Pacar. He does not yet have the clout to be in an online encyclopedia. Beckenbauer05 21:09, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

I don't agree with you at all, yes I am the one who puts most of the stuff on here about Johnny because I am a fan but I don't think it is shameless vanity. This stuff on here was found on IMDB and maybe I should have a footnote about that or something but I don't know how to do that. Yes, you can find most of the stuff on IMDB which I did but a lot of other websites about people have information which is found on IMDB as well or in other news sites. Most of the things on here from celebrities are takin from other sites and news sources such as IMDB, TV.com and others. Also, Mr. Pacar does have the right to be on an online encyclopedia. There are a lot of other people on wikipedia with even less of a status than him. If you're going to take him off why not take everybody off who has little known facts about them, isn't a big celebrity yet, or who's information can be found in other websites? I feel Johnny Pacar should stay on wikipedia because all of the things on here are true about him, they are not irrelevant nonsence. They are true facts about Mr. Johnny Pacar.Jgirl813

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.