Wiki143:Articles for deletion/Init
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was withdrawn — Adrian~enwiki (talk) 21:20, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
Init
WITHDRAWN BY NOMINATOR
Janitorial nomination following on from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ntoskrnl. "Wikipedia isn't a technical how-to or an indiscriminate collection of information; see WP:NOT." may apply here also. No vote from me at this stage. kingboyk 15:15, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
- I think this can be withdrawn now. There's a clear keep concensus. As I said it was a janitorial nomination to stimulate some debate and focus minds at the other AFD. I maintain that the article is something of a howto (it even uses the dreaded "you") but the {{tone}} tag addresses that issue. --kingboyk 21:03, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
- Strong keep: An important and somewhat visible element of Linux/Unix boot. The article still needs the clean-up, though. Peter Grey 15:45, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, although the article could still use some cleanup (i.e. increasing its relevance). Without Init, you wouldn't have a running system; you'd just have a kernel sitting there doing nothing. --Elkman - (talk) 16:01, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
- Definite keep — This is neither a technical how-to, nor an indiscriminate fact. The init daemon is a key component of UNIX. — RJH 16:28, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
- Strong keep — the article is not at all like a how-to, and the topic is notable. — A.M. 20:50, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep, yeah. --maru (talk) contribs 20:54, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
- technical keep, as sufficiently relevant to be non-indiscriminate and useful to readers. — Adrian~enwiki (talk) 21:18, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.