Wiki143:Articles for deletion/Hoskinson Tizenski Data Compression Algorithm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 09:38, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Hoskinson Tizenski Data Compression Algorithm

A carefully prepared nihilartikel, ie. an hoax. Claiming 1000-fold compression was the giveaway. No related Google hits except a Wikipedia user talk page which lead me to: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Hoskinson. See also Talk:Charles Hoskinson. -- RHaworth 17:25, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Avi 19:50, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

This is not a hoax! I use the damn algorithm every single day for my work with Oracle. It has serious problems in form as well as mathematical syntax. The 1,000 fold compression is only the result of billions of calculations per megabyte; totally impractical for any application, but tempting enough to consider research. I decided to post its existence on Wikipedia because of its limited exposure on the web. Thanks Wikipedia, in your hunt for perfection you are attacking a mathematical marvel.

Dr. William Mossberg Senior Theoretical Mathematical consultant Oracle Corporation — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drmossberg (talk • contribs)

Bona fides, please. "Dr. William Mossberg" gives 0 google results [1]

So does "William Mossberg" and Oracle [2] -- Avi 01:51, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete You beat me to it with the further debunking of the endorser. Amateur... Tearlach 02:01, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Thousand-fold compression, huh? Delete until this can actually fit my entire porn collection on one floppy disk. --Kinu 02:53, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as hoax. I've seen much better hoax attempts. OhNoitsJamie^Talk 08:08, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete - as hoax --Haham hanuka 12:30, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.