Wiki143:Articles for deletion/Gateway City
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Non-admin closure by Skomorokh 05:43, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Gateway City
- Template:La (delete) – (View log)
Non notable fictional place, this is no gotham and it is completely unsourced and lacking any assertion of notability, not even verified. Myheartinchile (talk) 23:40, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:03, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. Notable location in the DC universe, and main turf of one of its three marquee characters, Wonder Woman. Ford MF (talk) 07:06, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- comment then why not merge with wonder woman?Myheartinchile (talk) 08:29, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Because it occurs in a shared universe, and while important to Wonder Woman, is not exclusive to her. As mentioned, it started out, for example, as a feature of Mr. Terrific comics in the Golden Age. Ford MF (talk) 16:42, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- comment, but the shared universe which is not verified, but i believe you, is not notable either, it can be mentioned in both wonder woman for which it is most notable and the other dude.Myheartinchile (talk) 21:06, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- Because it occurs in a shared universe, and while important to Wonder Woman, is not exclusive to her. As mentioned, it started out, for example, as a feature of Mr. Terrific comics in the Golden Age. Ford MF (talk) 16:42, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- comment then why not merge with wonder woman?Myheartinchile (talk) 08:29, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Weak Keep if it is referenced and verifiable that Wonder Woman's Gateway City is the same one used by the other characters than I'd say although it is "no Gotham" it could still be included. The article does need improvement but, needing improvement isn't reason for deletion. And it does have a reference. Jasynnash2 (talk) 09:02, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.