Wiki143:Articles for deletion/Game maker gene
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. — FireFox • T [14:59, 09 April 2006]
Game maker gene
Delete - nn vanity/spam. Wickethewok 04:51, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Can't this be speedied? NTK 04:56, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - what grounds could it be speedied on? Wickethewok 04:57, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
- I suppose it can't. But at least a quick consensus can be formed. NTK 05:07, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
- I initially suggested it to be speedied on the grounds of WP:VAIN and WP:CSD, Articles, 7. >> \\/\//esleyPinkha//\/\\ | 07:09, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
- I suppose it can't. But at least a quick consensus can be formed. NTK 05:07, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Delete nn and vanity.--Jersey Devil 05:12, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
- Strong delete perhaps speedily as a nn-group (the infamous A7). I see no assertion of significance, do you? I sometimes miss them, when they're ridiculous. Mak (talk) 05:18, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
- Strong delete, remarkably non-notable. Also, Wikipedia is not here to stick it to the man, now is it? --Deville (Talk) 05:46, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Delete, nn. --Terence Ong File:Flag of Singapore.svg 06:36, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Delete Having first noticed this site, I've supported its deletion. >> \\/\//esleyPinkha//\/\\ | 07:09, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Delete nn and vanity--_Joe_ 07:25, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Delete nn. --Quadduc 13:17, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Delete If I had found that first it would be lining the speedy bin. Highway Rainbow Sneakers 13:23, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
- Strong delete per everyone. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:08, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
- Strong delete: non-notable, self-advertisement, self-reference. --Saforrest 18:32, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.