Wiki143:Articles for deletion/Feminist design

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 03:04, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Feminist design

Stub that never got expanded; I'm not sure this is a credible concept. Is there really a distinct "feminist" school of design (aside from there being 2 articles about it)? Delete. Catamorphism 02:51, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Non-notable. --Blog Mav Rick 03:06, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Danny Lilithborne 03:11, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete half the time I can't tell if this arch-feminist stuff is satire or not. Garden design? Opabinia regalis 03:23, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable. --Coredesat talk 04:39, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge to a mention in the design methods article. --Nscheffey^(T/C) 08:48, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable. This could be expanded and placed into a larger article on sex outlook differences and would be very nice. As it is, there is simply not enough for a stand-alone article. Ted^Talk/_{Contributions} 15:42, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.