Wiki143:Articles for deletion/February 31
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. None of the suggested redirects seem particularily feasible to me, so I won't make them. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:10, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
February 31
Did this actually happen? Google doesn't seem to think so. Francs2000 File:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg 15:15, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as unverifiable hoax. I love The Onion but the second you are using anything outside the A.V. Club as a source your argument is shot.--Isotope23 15:30, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, but then redirect to February as aid to the confused and the drunk. :) Xoloz 16:39, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- To prevent future hoaxes and stupidities of this sort, I have made preemptive redirects for April 31, June 31, September 31, and November 31. One thing I'm good at is "out-dumbing" the dumb. :) Xoloz 13:16, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete and redirect as hoax. There was a February 30 once, though. --Carnildo 21:21, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete but if it's going to redirect should it not go to 3 April except in leap years when it should go to 2 April? CambridgeBayWeather 21:45, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Why? It's March that comes after February... -- Francs2000 File:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg 21:49, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Oh! Must be a special Canadian thing where Feb becomes April.
- Why? It's March that comes after February... -- Francs2000 File:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg 21:49, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete We don't have articles for individual months in the 1st century. The earliest year we currently split by month is 2000. If we're going to start doing this, I suggest we start with the 20th century instead, rather than February 31.Caerwine 04:29, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.