Wiki143:Articles for deletion/EBEARD FILMS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete per WP:VAIN, WP:NN and WP:V. Tangotango 12:39, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

EBEARD FILMS

Fails WP:CORP. Fails google test. Fails WP:V. Unfortunately also fails to meet WP:CSD A7 as it asserts notability. –Dicty (T/C) 14:08, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete WP:VAIN, WP:NN, WP:V and the rest, lame fantasist's drivel. --DaveG12345 14:19, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete internet-based "film" company with a grand total of one Google hit. That's about as non-notable as it gets, folks. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:26, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: WP:VAIN, WP:NN, WP:V, WP:CORP. --Coredesat 21:00, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Reverted vandalism by 220.233.169.181. --DaveG12345 11:01, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

• Keep the videos are funny if u watch them, he is big in australia, a website is being launched in july. www.ebeardfilms.com --big pon 06:37, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Ebeard Films has currently made it into the finals of the Tropfest competition in sydney. Deletion would hamper this fine companies chances of winning—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 220.101.183.44 (talk • contribs) 2006-06-27 07:05:52 (UTC)
• Keep Ebeard is a valuable company, website coming up, public exposure, tropfest in sydney. big in sydney not world but other entries on wikipedia arent valid internationally either i.e Adam Mogg --218.214.57.10 12:06, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep have u seen the website, funny stuff, i would say that due to the views on each vid and tropfest that this is a more than relevant page to be featured in wikipedia... i also agree with wat has been previously discussed.. that there are many irrelevant pages wider society on wikipedia i.e. Adam Mogg --220.233.169.181 08:23, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Comment, these comments were made by the article creator and three IP sockpuppets. Adam Mogg's notability is irrelevant to this debate. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 12:32, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.