Wiki143:Articles for deletion/Claudia Newman
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE — Gwalla | Talk 05:09, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Claudia Newman
Hoax. -- Longhair | Talk 10:12, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- There is a URL from a news site linked in the article that proves that the story is completely false. The name does not even match that of the article.
- Delete -- Longhair | Talk 10:12, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Ambi 10:13, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Strong Delete -- Could the spammer please stop? RussellG 10:57, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- There is no basis for that claim.
- Unsigned comment above from 220.237.197.101 -- Longhair | Talk 10:58, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- The article you linked to yourself disproves your article.
-
- It most certainly does not
- Unsigned comment above from 220.237.197.101 -- Longhair | Talk 11:24, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: Sign your posts people. After your comment, use four of these ~~~~ -- Longhair | Talk 11:26, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- I see no evidence it disproves it (JoJo)
- Unsigned comment above from 220.237.197.101 -- Longhair | Talk 11:29, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Nice tits. delete Dunc|☺ 12:15, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep -- 'JoJo 13:28, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)JoJo'
- Keep CzechPartisan
- Comment: CzechPartisan's only edits are to VfD. -- Longhair | Talk 13:57, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Quite so, no need to get snarky. Given your reasoning thus far it seems this is only a popularity contest anyway. Go whine to the T-man about it. 'JoJo 13:52, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)JoJo'
- Strong delete, as soon as possible. Also, votes by sockpuppets shouldn't be counted. Columbia 13:54, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
Hey, they called you a sock puppet! Not like your votes which we must assume as legit... 'JoJo 13:59, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)JoJo' Keep Matthewleung87 14:16, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Strong Keep Jamesss 14:26, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Sockpuppets Proto 14:35, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- DeleteLectonar 14:55, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Nonsense. --Habap 15:03, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, hoax. Alphax τεχ 15:06, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- I sense... a great disturbance... in sockpuppets. Delete. jglc | t | c 15:07, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete nice cleavage — unconfirmed; no google match; likely hoax. — RJH 15:18, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete hoax, nothing in the news article supports what is said here. --Etacar11 16:37, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete if the article makes anyone notable, it's the girl, not her "mother". Septentrionalis 18:06, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete sock supported hoax. Capitalistroadster 01:45, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Strongest Keep having spoken to some friends of mine, they assure me this is worth keeping. I agree wholeheartedly- 'Hotpants 07:05, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)Hotpants'
- okay, keep, but only because of the tits. Last one, geez 'TagTeam 07:43, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)TagTeam'
- Delete - Sockpuppet-backed hoax. This is a recording. --FCYTravis 09:12, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep- very good form, and lack of a persuasive argument that it is fiction- 'Freezer 10:05, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)Freezer'
- Delete - rubbish backed up by sockpuppets, possible copyvio picture. More pseudo-postmodernist experimentation? - Skysmith 10:38, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Nope, not a copyright violation, she said she gave the photo to a friend- 'TagTeam 10:47, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)TagTeam'
- "Keep" MARMOT 16:53, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.