Wiki143:Articles for deletion/Chiltern Edge School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge. Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 20:31, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Chiltern Edge School

Template:La – (View log)

No claim of notability is made for the school, nor is it implicit in the article Jack1956 21:20, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

• Keep It appears to be a high school, which we've been keeping as notable. It's the primary and middle schools that are up for debate. Eliz81 22:10, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
• Comment It is not a high school, it is a secondary school. It is quite different to the American concept. Apart from that, there is no Wikipedia guideline which states that either secondary schools or high schools are inherently notable. All schools have to conform to WP:N. The article as it currently stands makes no claim for the school's notability. Jack1956 22:16, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
• Merge to Reading, Berkshire article as it is nothing more then just location and enrollment with the principal mentionned.--JForget 22:53, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
• Merge/Redirect to Sonning Common unless additional material can be uncovered to more clearly demonstrate notability. Alansohn 02:09, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. -- Bduke 10:04, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
• Merge with the article on Sonning Common. (The school is in Sonning not Reading.) until someone is ready to expand the article so that it justifies its own page. 11:58, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
• Comment I would support Merge.Jack1956 12:42, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to Sonning Common. This didn't need an AfD to do this and such negligible stubs should be handled in such a manner as a normal editing process. TerriersFan 23:13, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
• Merge any sourced facts to the locality. -- But|seriously|folks  18:38, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.