Wiki143:Articles for deletion/Censuswhacking

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD✉ 00:23, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

Censuswhacking

• Dont Delete Is mentioned on several sites - including BBC Evil Angel

Not a single use-site... coverd by the BBC and others NN Neologism used by one site on the interent. Googlewhack is a little different. humblefool® 07:26, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Seems to be a neologism. DarthVader 11:20, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. 10:50, 24 July 2005 (UTC) User: 24.171.36.233.

Not a single use-site... coverd by the BBC and others

• Delete. Non notable neologism. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:14, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. It has been mentioned on the BBC's website but probably never will be again. If the practice becomes notable beyond the website from whence it originates then I look forward to the article's return. Flowerparty ^talk 23:47, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete neologism. JamesBurns 07:00, 27 July 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.