Wiki143:Articles for deletion/Blogsite

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Redirect to Blog. --May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 09:40, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

Blogsite

Not encylopedic, this is a dicdef. Skrewler 06:20, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

• Redirect to blog, just like most of the links within this article. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:41, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Yes, but, there is already List_of_blogging_terms. This can just be deleted. -Skrewler 11:44, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
    • Not deleted, redirected. Then people who enter "Blogsite" in the Search box and click "Go" will end up at blog, which is where they probably want to be, right? — Haeleth Talk 17:45, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
• I suppose redirect doesn't hurt. And merge if possible. Punkmorten 20:56, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect per MacGyver. Andrew Levine 23:08, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Femmina 00:40, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect per Haeleth. --Quiddity 02:57, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. 65.34.232.136 02:58, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Nope, sorry, "blogs" are not worth a shit in the real world. JacksonBrown 05:45, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Blog. —Cleared as filed. 11:31, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect per above. Dottore So 11:43, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Worthless. --86.2.56.178 12:03, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
• If someone can write an encyclopedic article about blogsites, let them do so. This isn't one, so delete. Titoxd^(?!?) 04:07, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect. Organized deletion vandalism merits banning. --FOo 05:14, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect. to blog for reasons stated above. --Veew 08:32, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, recreate, make redirect, and protect aka salt the earth. The bar for blogging terms (and blogs themselves) is just the same as for anything else: make yourself encyclopedic by being on the cover of the New York Times or something. - brenneman^(t)(c) 10:05, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable, wikipedia isnt the place for blogtards. Incognito 12:51, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.