Wiki143:Articles for deletion/Bewick Cory

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Bratsche^{talk 5 pillars} July 1, 2005 23:58 (UTC)

Bewick Cory

Delete. This is absolute nonsense, and I tagged it for speedy, but I guess it might be too long and appear to be too coherent to really qualify. Not funny enough for BJAODN, either. AиDя01DTALKEMAIL 03:10, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)

• I'm having trouble deciding whether this is vanity or patent nonsense. The only real claim to notability I can see is the declaration that he's a "world famous political commentator." Whatever it is, it needs to be deleted. Scott5114 07:50, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nonsense. JamesBurns 10:12, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nearly-patent nonsense — this ought to be speediable but I fear it probably isn't in a strict sense.-Splash 16:11, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
• KEEP THIS I think it is hilarious, and I feel we should keep it based on that alone.

left by 70.84.160.84 --Tznkai 16:54, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• KEEP THIS Unless we can prove that it is nonsense, we've got to let it stay.

Left by 67.128.60.1 --Tznkai 16:54, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• KEEP IT As unrealistic as they may seem, these are all true events and many people have inquiries to who Bewick Cory is. This provides needed information as to the profile of this individual no matter how unbelivable. Feel free to google his name to see what I mean.

Left by 67.128.60.1 --Tznkai 16:54, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Struck out duplicate vote. — Phil Welch 05:11, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• • • • It was not a duplicate vote. They are both from the same IP address because we posted from the same office building. I am sure you are aware of Routers and NAT? (unsigned comment by 67.128.60.1)

• • Google returns 14 [1] hits for "Bewick Cory" one of which is this article and most of the rest of which are from a single site which seems to be a blog-type thing to which he contributes. - Splash 21:14, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
    • If you look closely at those results, you will see multiple blogs and discussions that he contributes. Also, he is a published author with a book to be released soon.

Excuse me, another book to be released soon :) — (Unsigned comment by 67.128.60.1; user's 6th edit.)

• • • • • "published author with a book to be released soon" is a contradiction in terms. AиDя01DTALKEMAIL 22:28, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
• BJAODN--Tznkai 16:54, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Nonsense. Jayjg ^(talk) 17:40, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Garbage. (Blatant vanity bordering on patent nonsense.) Delete, candidate for speedy deletion. - Mike Rosoft 17:57, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete --Carnildo 20:51, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Right on top of the line between cohesion and nonsense, which is a little too "close for comfort". Wikiacc (talk) 21:41, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete --Xcali 22:08, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• BJAODN 68.116.215.116|3rd

Sorry, didn't know about signing. I'm new at this. -- 68.116.215.116

• Delete nn vanity bordering on nonsense. --Etacar11 23:10, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Keep it!

• Delete and remind that this page is used to form a consensus of intelligent editors,. It is not a Diebold electronic voting machine. We can see through pointless arguments and sockpuppets. Dystopos 03:54, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete this vanity/nonsense. Sockpoppets always draw more countervotes than they unsuccessfully try to forge. Xoloz 03:55, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• It might be a senseless argument, but sockpuppets are not going on here. (unsigned comment by 67.128.60.1)
  • Sockpuppet, meatpuppet, what's the difference? (See WP:SOCK, at the bottom) --Etacar11 14:12, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.