Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP
(Redirected from Verizon v. Trinko)
Template:Use mdy dates Template:Infobox SCOTUS case Verizon Communications v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP, often shortened to Verizon v. Trinko, 540 U.S. 398 (2004), is a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in the field of Antitrust law. It held that the Telecommunications Act of 1996 had not modified the framework of the Sherman Act, preserving claims that satisfy established antitrust standards without creating new claims that go beyond those standards. It also refused to extend the essential facilities doctrine beyond the facts of the Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp. case.
See also
- Verizon Communications Inc. v. FCC I
- Verizon Communications Inc. v. FCC II
- List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 540
External links
- Text of Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP, 540 U.S. 398 (2004) is available from: CourtListener Google Scholar Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)
Template:United States antitrust law Script error: No such module "Navbox".