User talk:WojPob
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is Template:Subpage otherWojPob's talk page, where you can send Template:Gender messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "Message box". User:MiszaBot/configTemplate:Archives
Images
If you ever happen to drop by again there are a handful of images that you uploaded that are missing information as to their source. It would helpful if you could add Image copyright tags to them. If they continue to lack source information they will regrettably have to be deleted. Below is the list of such images. - SimonP 22:11, Nov 8, 2004 (UTC)
- Image:AirForceOne.jpg
- Image:Alfalfa im.jpg
- Image:Charlie Chaplin.jpg
- Image:Frida Kahlo.jpg
- Image:Village pump.JPG
- Image:Warsaw flag.png
Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
- Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
- Multi-Licensing Guide
- Free the Rambot Articles Project
To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:
- Option 1
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
OR
- Option 2
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)
|
File:WikiThanks.png
Thank you for your contribution at Pune. |
hay...
...do you ever still log on cause if you do respond --Sub619 (talk)
love ur work
Love your work!
a anonymous person...
--LordPolarVaderI (talk)
Should this user be deleted because the account owner died 22 years ago
188.163.120.175 posted at the bottom of archive 1 that the owner died. Hvehireihghwit (talk) 13:36, 7 April 2025 (UTC)