User talk:ViperSnake151
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is Template:Subpage otherViperSnake151's talk page, where you can send Template:Gender messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
User:MiszaBot/config Script error: No such module "Message box". Why revert my edit on WNOW-FM?
About Mascot 2018 Asian Games
Information icon Hello, I'm Andreas Evando P. I just knew that you reverted one of my recent contributions —the one I made with this edit to 2018 Asian Games— I'm telling you it's not fake. It's Official! Ika is now changed to Kaka. You can see it in their offical website. So please, you reverted my edit back. Thanks.
Countdown template and MOS:TIME and MOS:DATED.
It looks like you believe that the Countdown template should not be used in articles per MOS:TIME and MOS:DATED. At least it is whet you added in the Template:Countdown template.
I do not understand the rational of this addition, and I did not see your explanation. MOS:TIME and MOS:DATED are not involved in the same way:
- MOS:TIME says "Context determines whether the 12- or 24-hour clock is used" this is for time and not for delays.
- MOS:DATED does not ban the usage of Template:Countdown neither explicitly not implicitly.
Also, the template provide seconds accuracy: Template:Countdown
Would it be possible to have a lower accuracy, for instance only the one or two more significant numbers such as 320 days and 1 hour or 45 weeks and 5 days?
You are invited to WikiProject YouTube
Script error: No such module "Message box".
Research Project
Hi Vipersnake151
I'm an anthropology student doing an online research project on wikipedians and their motivations and ideals for writing and editing wikipedia pages. I was wondering if you would be interested in answering a few questions I have - sort of like a small online interview.
Best Karoline Husbond (Student at University of Texas Austin) - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Karohusb
Windows Update
Hello, why did you undo my edit on Windows Update, where I corrected "Windows ME" to the correctly spelled "Windows Me", which is the official way of how Microsoft writes this program in its short version?
DYK for Regulations on children's television programming in the United States
Template:Ivmbox Z1720 (talk) 00:03, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
Backstage
You commented that the revisions to this page were AI generated. This content was written by me and not AI generated.
Content was reverted to the original article, which contained much uncited content. I attempted to correct that. Why was all the new, CITED content removed? While many paragraphs of uncited content was restore. I don't understand this at all. WIkipedia standards are to make content clear and straightforward, which I attempted to do. Doesn't look like you attempted to "salvage" anything at all. You also restored many inaccuracies, including the current editor in chief and there the company is located.
Also, the recast of the title was to more accurately reflect what Backstage has been for the last 15 years -- it started as a publication but is now recognized more widely as a job platform. This revision was an attempt to help users (esp its core demographic) who might not be aware of the platform's legacy as a magazine. Jenisok (talk) 15:01, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
Nomination of Indian Premier League on television for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian Premier League on television until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.