User talk:Tslocum
Template:Lowercase Template:Talkheader
p2pChan
Just wondering on wheres the source code for p2pchan. Also whats the status of that project and how workable it is. I think there is a possibility of reviving it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akimbomidget (talk • contribs) 11:26, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Sayyed Aamir Ali
I have just started work on this article, I have also furnished a reference as well. Could you possibly remove deletion tag from this article?--Asikhi (talk) 08:20, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
doood!!
Your back! Sticking around for a while? THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 08:47, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
- I don't use Huggle much now for reverting, but the dropdown menu for reverting with the other warnings doesn't list shortcuts anymore so perhaps they're gone. Your not the only one wondering: Wikipedia_talk:Huggle#Keyboard_shortcuts_for_non-vandalism_revert_reasons. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 09:06, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
I3detroit
Regarding the warning you left for Bradmcma when he blanked the article he created at I3detroit (since deleted), you shouldn't revert and warn him about that as his blanking of the article can be taken as a request for deletion per WP:CSD#G7. You should just re-tag the article with Template:Tl. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:07, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "Template:Mono" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:29, 18 June 2010 (UTC)