User talk:Traumerei

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• How to edit a page
• Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style
• If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! --Lst27 (talk) 00:10, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Medievia

The salient point is that someone else makes the claim that it was a derivative work, not Wikipedia. So as long as there's a cite to some third party source, I think that's fine. Thanks for the rewrite! Nandesuka 15:20, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Zelazny

You're very welcome. :) You may also be interested in my theory, closely-held but fragile, that the Belle Epoque references while scribing the Second Pattern, taken in context of Merlin's proxy encounter with Deirdre some books later, mean that the main subject Corwin was actually thinking about during his act of cosmogony was Deirdre, though he's too shy to tell us outright, allusive creature that he is. That means that there's a huge amount about Corwin's history on Earth that no one's telling us, of course (big surprise), but the Deirdre encounter means that regardless. (This is one of the things that pleases and amazes me most about Zelazny: that momentary events can have implications that change everything. Like Dworkin's one-line off-hand mention that, by the by, he already destroyed and recreated the Pattern once.) —chaos5023 (talk) 15:52, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Night on Blad Mountain

Thanks for catching that! Regards, Hamster Sandwich (talk) 20:58, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Ashley Gjøvik for deletion

File:Ambox warning orange.svg

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ashley Gjøvik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashley Gjøvik until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sebastien1118 (talk) 09:42, 11 June 2022 (UTC)