User talk:Tkorrovi
World Citizen userbox, {{User:1ne/Userboxes/User world}}
Hi, I noticed the message saying you're a World Citizen, I would like to invite you to add {{User:1ne/Userboxes/User world}} to your user page if you wish to proclaim it in a more effective way, and this template will also add you automatically to the Wikipedians with World Citizenship category. :) --Mistress Selina Kyle 23:54, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
Do you agree to be in ai interested list I am making?
Hi there
I am making an ai interested people list so we interact better and help improving the work we are doing.
Do you agree to be part of this list ? Raffethefirst (talk) 13:56, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- I have nothing against.Tkorrovi (talk) 21:02, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
user talk
thank you for your offer to discuss AI off forum / off wikipedia .. i would love to discuss AI with anyone who has an open mind about the subject .. but your comment on my user talk page seems a bit dismissive and i wish to respond to that here (golden rule). just because researchers in AI have not developed truly AI - does not imply that they knew what they were doing for all that time. perhaps they were looking in an inappropriate area or perhaps they focused on inappropriate models or perhaps they made inappropriate assumptions. i believe when you dismiss me the way you do on my user talk page, you do not fully understand and appreciate my model which can be found at: [1] if you truly read and understood my model, i believe you would not be so quick to dismiss it. many years of self-critical contemplation "went into" that model. just because i am not of "the elite" does not make my statements invalid or worthless. just because i don't have a string of letters following my name - does not make my ideas childish or immature. my approach is based on the systems approach which is typically underutilized, underestimated, and misunderstood. so before you criticize my model, read it - read more about the systems approach. then - after you are fully informed - freely criticize. but your casual remark on my user page begged this response. if you delete it, i will put it back. the world should see how narrowminded you truly are. ps - there is rather new thing called canonizer.com; if you have a "stand" about a thing - like consciousness, you should state your case there. much better than debating things on user pages which no one reads...&Delta (talk) 03:21, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Whoops!
Great embarassment. Must have been tabs rearranging themselves. Paradoctor (talk) 23:12, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi -- I see that you reverted a set of edits on the basis that "Too large part of the original article was deleted during the editing ...". I think you might have misperceived -- nothing at all was actually deleted. I have no strong opinion about the validity of the edits, but the editor seems to be competent, so I'm not happy to see his first edits met this way. Regards, Looie496 (talk) 16:51, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
Your account will be renamed
Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Tkorrovi. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Tkorrovi~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
03:22, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Error: Invalid time.. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the [[Special:SecurePoll/vote/Template:Arbitration Committee candidate/data|voting page]]. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Template:Tlx to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)