User talk:Thomas Ruefner
Thanks for all your cleanup on Phèdre --Arcadian 04:06, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
re: Lucien Goldmann
Hey, thanks for contributing to the article. I am certainly no expert, and only have experience with Le dieu caché, not anything else. so if you think of anything, just throw it on there...
re: uomo universale
hello thomas, thanks for writing to me. sorry, i did not read the talk page before editing U.U. my beef with the previous content was that it pretty much just repeated information also given on the polymath page. i am totally receptive to the concepts being differentiated - this just wasn't how i read the previous iteration. it sounds to me like you do in fact know the difference, so please add a sentence or two explaining it! best, Aaronbrick 18:34, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
re: dab Altdorf
Hi, would know for sure which one the four links on Special:Whatlinkshere/Altdorf should point to? I suppose it's at least twice Weingarten. -- User:Docu
Re: Fritz Schulz stub class?
- Hi. First thanks for your notification. I agree with you that the article is a little more than "very little meaningful content" but it need a few more improvments for start class. I use this too. For a Start class an article should "provide enough sources to establish verifiability" and there is not any sources in the article. If you or any other person can add some sources then it would be an start class article. Thanks again and soory for my not well english. Solar-Poseidon 22:37, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
- If it is a biographical paper the it is enough for Start class. But the current section title (Literature) should change to References. This title can make people to misunderstand it. Personally I thought it is one of his works. I think you can reassess the article if you want (or leave a message for me to this). Thanks again. Solar-Poseidon 23:23, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)