Hi Randolph, and a warm welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you have enjoyed editing as much as I did so far and decide to stay. Unfamiliar with the features and workings of Wikipedia? Don't fret! Be Bold! Here's some good links for your reference and that'll get you started in no time!
Most Wikipedians would prefer to just work on articles of their own interest. But if you have some free time to spare, here are some open tasks that you may want to help out :
Wikiprojects - So many to join, so many to choose from...Take your pick!
Oh yes, don't forget to sign when you write on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments. And finally, if you have any questions or doubts, don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Once again, welcome! =)
Latest comment: 30 May 20112 comments2 people in discussion
Please post messages below this line.
Hi Randolph, could you please tell me if in New Caledonia is possible to easily find organic food and other organic products? I will really appreciate this information. Please mail me to anafon@yahoo.comCoralina (talk) 17:28, 10 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
While I'm totally fine with my edits being changed, your revert has done nothing to clarify the issue either. The facts are: Nietzsche was not an existentialist, both existentialism and Nietzsche's philosophies are atheistic, and Kierkegaard stands opposite those philosophies in different ways. My edit addressed the first issue, and I tried to leave the other two intact. Your revert ignores the first issue and muddles the last, and in your edit description you give future editors nothing much to work with. How do you think that we could get the issue of Nietzsche and existentialism fixed without "confusing the issue"? -Seth Mahoney 19:21, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
I'd be happy to take up this discussion on the relevant talk page. Have you posted this message there? --Randolph 19:23, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Sharyn Clough VFD
Latest comment: 2 May 20052 comments2 people in discussion
Hey, Randolph...
I've rewritten the article on Sharyn_clough, and I'm wondering if you'd consider taking a look at the rewrite and reconsidering your vote for deletion. Best wishes, --Jacobw15:26, 2 May 2005 (UTC)Reply
I've revisited the article and posted comments in the relevant vfd section. I'm still not moved to change my vote at this point. --Randolph16:12, 2 May 2005 (UTC)Reply
Amilcar Compund page fake
Randoplh you are correct the information on the Amilcar Compound is completely fake.
Melbourne High School
Latest comment: 7 August 20051 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 25 January 20062 comments2 people in discussion
Hello there! I wanted to thank you for taking the time to vote on my arbitration commitee nomination. Although it was not successful, I appreciate the time you spent to read my statement and questions and for then voting, either positively or negativly. Again, thank you! Páll(Die pienk olifant)22:42, 25 January 2006 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for uploading Image:Graham kennedy.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Latest comment: 7 June 20081 comment1 person in discussion
{{Wikipedia:Meetup/Brisbane 2/Invite}}
Hey there, you're invited to the second Brisbane Meetup. Please see the page at Wikipedia:Meetup/Brisbane/2 for more details. Hope to see you there!
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:G kennedy and b newton.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk06:49, 2 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to you because your userpage (user:Randolph) says you are located in 'Queensland' without specifying which region of Queensland you are located in. Please add a more specific sub-category in order to be informed of what is happening in your region.)