User talk:Neumannkun
Herzlichen Dank fuer die Blumen. Bin auch ziemlich stolz auf den Artikel. Hab sogar im Toto showroom einen Manager interviewt (auf Japanisch, daher kann es sein, dass sich einige fehler eingeschlichen haben). Deine Arbeit ist uebrigens auch ziemlich interessant, und steht bei mir selbstverstaendlich in Printform auf dem Regal. Ich hab noch einige andere Artikel ueber Japan verfasst, siehe User:Chris 73/CompletedWork. Viele Gruesse aus Nagoya, Chris 73 Talk 14:25, Nov 11, 2004 (UTC)
I redid most of your changes. Describing non QmP wine as "mediocre" is not neutral point of view, and nor is saying that the other categories are in order of quality - they are ordered by ripeness which may not correspond to quality, which you partially said, but I dont think even the version I have left is very reasonable. Icewine is seperate as it is defined by process rather than ripeness, so I moved it. But please do add stuff to German wine, as it needs more work... Justinc 16:39, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Guardian Angels
The Guardian Angels do not exist in Germany. Unlike the German style of preemptive self-defense (i.e., the invasion of Poland and Russia) the Angels do not practice preemptive self-defense. We provide medical assistance to those in need on the street and call the police if we see a crime occurring like a group of thugs beating up a gay person. We stop gangs and thugs from oppressing and persecuting others, not the other way around.
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Yamanote Halloween Train. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of this article, you may comment on the article's AFD entry instead. Thank you. --Calton | Talk 02:40, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Image source problem with Image:Yulara Flugzeug.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Yulara Flugzeug.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the Template:Tl tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as Template:Tlp or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:57, 30 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 06:57, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
You edited this article (a few years ago) with the comment "moving "human" to "human being" to allow homonymy distinction for "human"" - what did you mean? -Stevertigo (t | log | c) 02:55, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Your account will be renamed
Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Neumannkun. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Neumannkun~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
01:46, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)