User talk:Metropolitan90

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 June 2025 by MediaWiki message delivery in topic Administrators' newsletter – June 2025
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Script error: No such module "Message box". Template:WP:TPS/banner

  1. REDIRECT Template:Archives

Template:Rcat shell

Administrators' newsletter – February 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2024).

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC about increasing the inactivity requirement for Interface administrators is open for feedback.

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

  • Pages that use the JSON contentmodel will now use tabs instead of spaces for auto-indentation. This will significantly reduce the page size. (Template:Phab)

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

  • Following a motion, the Arbitration Committee adopted a new enforcement restriction on January 4, 2024, wherein the Committee may apply the 'Reliable source consensus-required restriction' to specified topic areas.
  • Community feedback is requested for a draft to replace the "Information for administrators processing requests" section at WP:AE.

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous


Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Administrators' newsletter – March 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2024).

<templatestyles src="Col-begin/styles.css"/>

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

  • The mobile site history pages now use the same HTML as the desktop history pages. (Template:Phab)

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous


Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Nomination of Where is Kate? for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Where is Kate? is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where is Kate? (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

IgnatiusofLondon (he/him☎️) 11:57, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – April 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2024).

File:ANEWSicon.png

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg Administrator changes

removed Template:Hlist

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

  • The Toolforge Grid Engine services have been shut down after the final migration process from Grid Engine to Kubernetes. (Template:Phab)

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous

  • Editors are invited to sign up for The Core Contest, an initiative running from April 15 to May 31, which aims to improve vital and other core articles on Wikipedia.

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Administrators' newsletter – May 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2024).

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

  • Partial action blocks are now in effect on the English Wikipedia. This means that administrators have the ability to restrict users from certain actions, including uploading files, moving pages and files, creating new pages, and sending thanks. T280531

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous


Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Happy First Edit Day!

Script error: No such module "Message box".

Administrators' newsletter – June 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2024).

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

  • The Nuke feature, which enables administrators to mass delete pages, will now correctly delete pages which were moved to another title. T43351

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous


Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Administrator!

Hi Metropolitan90!

As you are an administrator, I can talk to you about any Wikipedia user. Right? Craig Lungren (talk) 04:19, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

  • You can ask, but I'm not going to promise any particular kind of answer. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:38, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
    Ok. Anyway a user named “GSK” (User:GSK) had told me on Talk:Wikipedia recently, on a topic that I started just hours ago today
    “If you're not going to drop this, I will open a discussion on you at WP:ANI, because it's becoming more and more clear that you are not here to contribute to the encyclopedia in any meaningful way and that you are treating Wikipedia as a battleground. You are picking fights with people that do not share your point of view, you are ignoring advice to take your ideas to the correct venue, and this kind of behavior is not tolerated on Wikipedia. I really do not want to have to open a discussion regarding your behavior here, but if you keep this up, I will not hesitate to escalate this to the Administrators' Noticeboard. You can choose to do better and to be better. No one but you can make that choice for you.”
    … and I wouldn’t know if they are a man or woman, but all of that they wrote is false information. The subject that I started on Talk:Wikipedia is titled “About Wikipedia”! And yet GSK likes to argue about “an edit that I have made” in defense. However, since I haven’t made a bad edit that involves anything like “swearing”, “bad name calling” in the talk page OR since I haven’t edited the Wikipedia “Article” page that goes against its purpose (such as adding everything related to “Wikipedia” followed by “Reliable Sources”), the truth is
    I don’t have to drop his/her Non-Sense of replies sent directly towards me. There is no appropriate reason for them to stupidly open a discussion on me at WP:ANI, because I am actually there (in the “Wikipedia” article talk page to contribute to the encyclopedia in a meaningful way and I wasn’t treating Wikipedia as a battleground. I was not picking fights with people and I wasn’t asking them to share my point of view, even when they were mentioning to me “this is not the place for a general discussion of the article’s subject”. I am not really ignoring the advice that they were giving me, to bring Wikipedia ideas to the correct venue, and my good behavior is not tolerating Wikipedia. I’m already doing good enough.
    Therefore, if you could talk to GSK about their silly behavior, that would be nice. And if they think that I was ignoring a Wikipedia Guideline, then you can return to me in your talk page here, and I will talk further to you about it! 🙂 Craig Lungren (talk) 06:24, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Craig Lungren: It appears that what rubbed GSK the wrong way was this edit. You had made a comment which had originally said, "Thanks GSK for reminding me of that, but I am stating a point that there should be a 3RD TAB mainly for Discussion of the Wikipedia Article itself! 🙂" Another user, Meters, responded to that comment. Then you changed your comment to say, "Thanks GSK for reminding me of that, and I understand that this current page is for exactly what you said, but I am stating a point that there should be a 3RD PAGE mainly for Discussion of the Wikipedia Article itself! 🙂" And Meters and GSK both had a problem with your editing your comment, which appears to have derailed your proposal about adding a second talk page to each article for discussion of the subject rather than the article.

To give you an illustration of why one should not edit their comment after someone has responded to it, suppose the discussion started out looking like this:

  • I am voting for candidate Mary Jones in the upcoming election. -- User #1, 09:00
    • Me too. -- User #2, 09:10

And then User #1 edits their original comment so it says:

  • I am voting for candidate John Smith in the upcoming election. -- User #1, 09:00
    • Me too. -- User #2, 09:10

You can see why that would not be acceptable, since it makes User #2 look like they are agreeing to something that they didn't agree to. Even though your edit was not as drastic as that, it still was not advisable to edit your comment that someone had already responded to.

In regard to what you were originally asking for, the idea of having a talk page to allow discussion of the topic of an article (as distinct from the article itself) has been proposed before, but it basically comes as a previously rejected proposal. See Wikipedia:Perennial proposals#Allow discussion about the topic of the article. If it weren't previously rejected, the place to ask for it would be Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) (not Talk:Wikipedia), but it would be best not to request it again at all. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 14:17, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Well, the way I edited it, does not make it inappropriate, but rather it could be going against Wikipedia rules, and could be called “Violating” rather than “inappropriate”. Even they should have said “Just look at the link” without including the “and drop this.” portion at the end of their sentence.Craig Lungren (talk) 15:03, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Of course, if they were giving me advice for the topic that I started, to bring it to the correct venue (according to Wikipedia Community norms), then all they should have said was “As this is not the right place for that discussion, try WP:VILLAGEPUMP.”
In their 2nd comment, they should have said “Please read WP:TALK#REVISE.” without including the extra sentence “It is not appropriate to modify your post after it has been replied to.”
Editing my own comments/posts is obviously normal anywhere on social media. Therefore it is not inappropriate. If I was editing someone else’s posts on Wikipedia rather than my own, then only that would be inappropriate (whether it be on Wikipedia or anywhere else on social media).
Their 2nd sentence could have been “That is because your latest edit goes against Wikipedia’s Guidelines and thus it violates the Community’s Standards, when you modify your own post after it has been replied to”. I mean that would make better sense to me, than calling my edit “Inappropriate”. Only then, it would have not become an argument.
Do you understand what I’m saying? 🙂 Craig Lungren (talk) 16:42, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yes, I understand what you are saying, but I don't see the point in continuing to discuss this with me, since you asked for my opinion as an administrator, and I gave it. I recommend that you let this go (per Wikipedia:Let it go). --Metropolitan90 (talk) 00:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Another thing is when I looked at “Mute features” it said “Mute features are unavailable, because you haven't confirmed your email address”.
I would like to know: How do I confirm my email address, when I’m already logged in to Wikipedia? (I really mean that the 2 things towards logging in to my username, includes entering my “email address” and “password”. So I don’t know how else to confirm it).
What is your advice? Craig Lungren (talk) 05:09, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Go to Special:Preferences. Scroll down to the "Email options" section of the page. There should be information about confirming your email address somewhere in there. (I don't know exactly what it will say.) --Metropolitan90 (talk) 14:45, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your instructions, and the outcome of it worked.
Anyway, I will say: I like your opinion and everything that is spoken in your first 2 comments to me! That was good, especially the 2nd one with the advice “Let it go”! They were the best messages I have seen! 👍 But as for My Opinion, I would like to inform you that …
  1. Any person that is an administrator, would actually not just give their opinion on an issue having to do with multiple users and be done with it in a short span like that, but they would also be the ones to chat with in big conversations and actually help with solving whatever problem/issue the main user is facing.
  2. An administrator giving me just 1 opinion of theirs on whatever it is, that I have to put up with annd encounter in front of other users, will not be good enough for me. Really I would rather want administrators (like you) to give as many opinions of theirs (like your own) than just 1, whenever I am aiming to go through everything that I can in front of them (or you), concerning the main issue I’m facing.
  3. An administrator would have more editing options available on Wikipedia versus all of the main/customer editors that would have available for them under their account (such as “lock” for article pages and choosing “Only Semi-Pro Editors” who can edit those specific “Article” pages.
  4. Are you one of those Wikipedia Administrators who I can count on for help and is really being able to discuss about any problem I encounter, for as long as it’s needed (especially when it is the other users who chose to start a fight in front of me, and has made me believe that they are the ones with inappropriate behavior and bad communication)? 🤔
Craig Lungren (talk) 18:00, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

As to your item #3 above, administrators already do have certain options not available to regular editors, including being able to protect a page (see Wikipedia:Protection policy). (We don't have anything called "semi-pro editors"; rather, there is such a thing as semi-protection which prohibits unregistered and very new editors from editing a page.) In regard to items #1, #2, and #4, I will say that no particular administrator is required to get involved in any particular dispute, nor, generally speaking, are they required to keep assisting once they have started to do so. I don't understand what you mean by giving "just 1 opinion", but I assume you mean you were looking for opinions as to each of the different issues you were facing (which I have already provided), as opposed to the same person providing two or more opinions on the same issue. To be honest, I am not convinced that other users have chosen to start a fight in front of you. If you are still concerned about the fact that User:Meters said that it was "not appropriate" to edit your comment after someone else had responded to it, I'm not going to be able to help you any more than I already have. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 20:54, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Well, I have at least given you my opinion now, and this was the first time that I have encountered an issue with multiple users.
All I can think of now is: Do you know of anyone else on Wikipedia who would actually try to help sort out the different issues, when I feel like they are needed?
I would like to see a respectful and honest answer from you please. Craig Lungren (talk) 21:43, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
You don't need to look for a specific person in advance for this. Depending on the type of issue you are having, there are various message boards where you can get help. In your case, I would recommend asking at Wikipedia:Teahouse where people can point you in the right direction. But you don't need to ask there now; wait until a new problem actually arises, if it ever does. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 22:09, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, and I love you a lot Metropolitan90.
It may not be till another 6 months or later now, until I actually return to you again! 👍
Just Remember: Every advice given to me IS only what I will accept (without any editor telling me things like [what I have mentioned to you in my 3rd to 4th comments above])! 🙂 Craig Lungren (talk) 22:56, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – July 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2024).

File:ANEWSicon.png

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg Administrator changes

added Template:Hlist
removed Template:Hlist

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous


Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Administrators' newsletter – August 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2024).

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

  • Global blocks may now target accounts as well as IP's. Administrators may locally unblock when appropriate.
  • Users wishing to permanently leave may now request "vanishing" via Special:GlobalVanishRequest. Processed requests will result in the user being renamed, their recovery email being removed, and their account being globally locked.

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration


Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Administrators' newsletter – September 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2024).

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous


Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of medical schools in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charlotte Amalie.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 3 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Script error: No such module "Message box".

Administrators' newsletter – October 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2024).

File:ANEWSicon.png

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg Administrator changes

added Template:Hlist
removed Template:Hlist

File:Checkuser Logo.svg CheckUser changes

readded Template:Hlist
removed Template:Hlist

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous


Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) Reply

Administrators' newsletter – November 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2024).

File:ANEWSicon.png

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg Administrator changes

readded Template:Hlist
removed Template:Hlist

File:Checkuser Logo.svg CheckUser changes

removed Maxim

File:Oversight logo.png Oversighter changes

removed Maxim

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

  • Mass deletions done with the Nuke tool now have the 'Nuke' tag. This change will make reviewing and analyzing deletions performed with the tool easier. Template:Phab

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous


Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC) Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Error: Invalid time.. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the [[Special:SecurePoll/vote/Template:Arbitration Committee candidate/data|voting page]]. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Template:Tlx to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – December 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2024).

File:ANEWSicon.png

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg Administrator changes

added Template:Hlist
readded Template:Hlist
removed Template:Hlist

File:Wikipedia Interface administrator.svg Interface administrator changes

added Template:Hlist
readded Pppery

File:Checkuser Logo.svg CheckUser changes

readded Template:Hlist

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration


Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Citations in the lead

Please read MOS:LEADCITE again where it says citations are not required or prohibited in the lead section. At Wikipedia:Featured article review its generally frowned upon to have any redundant citation in the lead, and it is my habit to follow WP:FA practice in the lead section which is not to use any citations unless it is content that this controversial or not cited in the body of the article. If you look at the Wikipedia:Today's featured article/December 2024, you will see the majority of the FA class articles have zero citations in the lead. Those that do, are usually doing so after a quote or a controversial claim. WP:DYKCRIT has never required citations in the lead, and my articles typically do not have them. Best.4meter4 (talk) 06:20, 12 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

DYK for The Philly Specials

Template:Ivmbox  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:02, 25 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – January 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2024).

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

  • The Nuke feature also now provides links to the userpage of the user whose pages were deleted, and to the pages which were not selected for deletion, after page deletions are queued. This enables easier follow-up admin-actions.

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous


Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Administrators' newsletter – February 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2025).

File:ANEWSicon.png

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg Administrator changes

readded Template:Hlist
removed Euryalus

File:Checkuser Logo.svg CheckUser changes

removed Template:Hlist

File:Oversight logo.png Oversighter changes

removed Template:Hlist

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

  • Administrators can now nuke pages created by a user or IP address from the last 90 days, up from the initial 30 days. Template:Phab
  • A 'Recreated' tag will now be added to pages that were created with the same title as a page which was previously deleted and it can be used as a filter in Special:RecentChanges and Special:NewPages. Template:Phab

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration


Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Definitely 182.239.92.235 (talk) 20:46, 10 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for February 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2025 Scottsdale Airport collision, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC News.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 12 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 3

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of awards and nominations received by Steven Spielberg
added a link pointing to The Name of the Game
List of people who have won multiple Academy Awards in a single year
added a link pointing to Sean Baker

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:04, 3 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – March 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2025).

File:ANEWSicon.png

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg Administrator changes

removed Template:Hlist

File:Checkuser Logo.svg CheckUser changes

removed Template:Hlist

File:Oversight logo.png Oversighter changes

removed AmandaNP

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

  • A new filter has been added to the Special:Nuke tool, which allows administrators to filter for pages in a range of page sizes (in bytes). This allows, for example, deleting pages only of a certain size or below. Template:Phab
  • Non-administrators can now check which pages are able to be deleted using the Special:Nuke tool. Template:Phab

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous


Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Administrators' newsletter – April 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2025).

File:ANEWSicon.png

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg Administrator changes

added Template:Hlist
readded Dennis Brown
removed Template:Hlist

File:Wikipedia bureaucrat.svg Bureaucrat changes

added Barkeep49

File:Checkuser Logo.svg CheckUser changes

added 0xDeadbeef

File:Oversight logo.png Oversighter changes

removed GB fan
readded Moneytrees

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous


Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Administrators' newsletter – May 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2025).

File:ANEWSicon.png

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg Administrator changes

added Rusalkii
readded NaomiAmethyst (overlooked last month)
removed Template:Hlist

File:Wikipedia Interface administrator.svg Interface administrator changes

removed Galobtter

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous


Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Happy First Edit Day!

Script error: No such module "Message box".

Happy First Edit Day!

File:Nuvola apps kate.svg
Happy First Edit Day!
File:Nuvola apps date.svg

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, RPE ✍️ 📚 00:26, 9 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Happy First Edit Day!

File:Balloons-aj.svg Hey, Metropolitan90. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day!
DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 01:43, 9 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
File:Face-smile.svg

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Eisley songs

File:Ambox warning pn.svg

A tag has been placed on Category:Eisley songs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 06:09, 26 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – June 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2025).

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC is open to determine whether the English Wikipedia community should adopt a position on AI development by the WMF and its affiliates.

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

  • An arbitration case named Indian military history has been opened. Evidence submissions for this case close on 8 June.

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous


Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".