User talk:Jurassosaurus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hello, Jurassosaurus, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

float
float

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!

Gr0ffLets talk 10:31, 10 October 2007 (CT)


Comments on Talk:Cold-blooded

Hi there Jurassosaurus. Thanks for your comments on Talk:Cold-blooded. Unfortunately I am not familiar with the terms bradymetabolism and tachymetabolism and could not find them in a dictionary or wikipedia, although a quick web search brought me some results. I am only around a first-year tertiary educated biology student, and so am not familiar with what would be deemed to be good conventions at present. If you had time, it would be great if you could add these two terms to the existing pages at least, at Cold-blooded and Warm-blooded.

Thanks!

PS. excellent work with your contributions so far. If you need any help, or have any comments, feel free to post on my talk page... --postglock 13:29, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

  • No problems. I wasn't sure how for long you had been on wikipedia. I had had a look at your contributions, and they were of very good quality, both in content and structure, and so I thought you may have been here previously under another user name... I have only been here for a few months myself, and I didn't want to sound patronising to someone that may have been here longer! :) (That's a compliment!) --postglock 07:43, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Megalania

That's cool - I just get suspicious when a prehistoric animal suddenly increases in size. J. Spencer (talk) 16:33, 8 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

  • Understandable; especially given how big that jump is. I would have caught it earlier, but I initially just went back to an earlier edit thinking that was the correct weight. I only realized the error yesterday when I was re-reading parts of the book. Jura (talk) 17:30, 8 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for December 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Monitor lizard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Extant. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ

  1. REDIRECT Template:• Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 29 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Crocs

Hi, just to let you know I reverted one of your edits. The job of the lead in a major article like this is to provide readers with a brief overview in around four paragraphs of the content of the article, not an easy thing to write, but essential. It isn't just a quick introduction, it's the view of the whole thing for readers who don't want to read everything, or who want to know their way around in a general way before going further. This, anyway, is the view of the people at FAC, who ought to know, and I think it's a good general guide to writing nearly anything. Hope that's fine with you. All the best, and Happy New Year, Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:12, 29 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Antorbital fenestra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Extant. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ

  1. REDIRECT Template:• Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 20 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Template:Ivmbox

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Template:Ivmbox

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Template:Ivmbox

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emma Schachner (June 7)

File:AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jannatulbaqi was: Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Baqi:) (talk) 07:06, 7 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
I would like to see the evidence that this article does not fit the Wikipedia article criteria. It has in-depth information on the subject. It uses reliable, secondary sources and most of the information is independent of the subject. The only possible exception here is a link to the subject's professional website, which is something other Wikipedia bios do (e.g., Lawrence Witmer). Jura (talk) 23:09, 7 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Jurassosaurus! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Baqi:) (talk) 07:06, 7 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emma Schachner (June 8)

File:AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". The comment the reviewer left was: Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 06:51, 8 June 2025 (UTC)Reply