User talk:Jens Meiert
Hello and welcome :) I hope you like the place and choose to stay.
Some useful links:
- Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers
- Wikipedia:How to edit a page
- Village pump - you can put questions you may have here (or use my talk page
By the way, re The Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab, if you want to make a stub, put a sentence describing the external link, instead of just the link itself, and we don't usually sign contributions either. Thanks, and have fun! :) Dysprosia 13:35, 5 Sep 2003 (UTC)
- Little late, but I noted that the page in question still is a stub … I will take a look at it again. -- Jens, 10:29, 15 Mar 2008 (CET)
You probably want to help in improving our markup, usability, and accessibility related articles ? For instance what about Conditional Comments you criticize so much ? I dont understand the german part (this) of your work but that might surely help the German Wikipedia too :-) Jonas, 21 Oct 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Just a tiny note. We recommend only using straight apostrophes at WP:PUNCT. That's all :) -- Quiddity (talk) 17:34, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia blocking VPNs
What is your position on this, exactly? Can you link to the WP discussions on the topic? Ogress smash! 22:04, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
- My position is rather simple: Authenticated users should be allowed to edit Wikipedia from any connection (forcing login is already an interesting demand, for anonymity does not equal malevolence). Forcing users off VPNs or Tor, then, as it seems practice for a while, appears excessive and like intentionally throwing users under the (mass surveillance) bus, for users don’t only visit Wikipedia, and may forget having been forced off a secure connection. I wish a more tactful approach to Wikipedia’s spam issues, if that’s the motivation behind this—take a user’s account age and edit history in account before forcing them to a different connection, make that insecure connection requirement a 50/50 thing, use CAPTCHAs, &c. There are probably a number of nicer alternatives to what’s enforced right now.—j9t (talk) 14:37, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Template:User talk other
- Not sure how to respond to unblock template stuff, however the reason why I could (and did) edit a page despite reporting a block was simply that I went off my VPN. At this point, again on a VPN connection, I still can’t edit anything other than this talk page.—j9t (talk) 19:35, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Error: Invalid time.. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the [[Special:SecurePoll/vote/Template:Arbitration Committee candidate/data|voting page]]. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Template:Tlx to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Error: Invalid time.. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the [[Special:SecurePoll/vote/Template:Arbitration Committee candidate/data|voting page]]. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Template:Tlx to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Error: Invalid time.. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the [[Special:SecurePoll/vote/Template:Arbitration Committee candidate/data|voting page]]. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Template:Tlx to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)