User talk:CNash

Biblical inconsistencies

Biblical inconsistencies is currently a messy list. Could you help tidy it up (it is huge)?

It will probably need to be cut into sections (e.g. by part of bible) and each section moved to a new page.CheeseDreams 00:38, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Evolutions of Pokemon

I think there is a reason to have the line "evolves from/to | none". Otherwise, someone might think that the evolutions were left out by mistake. (Some lines in some of the tables were left out.) In my opinion, there is a reason to put in nones in cases such as Charmander or Charizard.User142 10:19, 1 May 2005 (UTC)

18 and R18 pics

Where did you get those full-size 18 and R18 certificate logos from? —Spe88 06:30, August 3, 2005 (UTC)

I did some Google searching, and it came up with this page from the BBFC's own website. CNash 10:56, 3 August 2005 (UTC)

Thanks. —Spe88 13:54, August 3, 2005 (UTC)

Spellbinder

Sorry for the delay. No, I don't know. I doubt it, though. Dysprosia 22:03, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

R Whites

In my opinion, it seemed like POV when I read through it. It may not have been. I apologise for that. ComputerJoe 12:25, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, CNash! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. —Xyrael / 16:10, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Re your vandalproof app above. Xyrael and I are both finding problems with the VP moderating feature, and it seems while I did not approve you due to your application not meeting the minimum edit requirement, your name was not removed from the list. So, some days later it seems you have! I have removed my initial post - apologies for the confusion and welcome to our team! Glen 01:34, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Salvia divinorum FAC withdrawn

See the WP:FAC instructions:

Nominators must be sufficiently familiar with the subject matter and sources to deal with objections during the FAC process. Nominators who are not significant contributors to the article should consult regular editors of the article prior to nomination.

I appreciate you're acting in good faith but it's best if featured articles are nominated by people who have worked closely on them. This way they can give reasoned replies to reviewers and be familiar with the sources to make any suggested improvements. Someone who hasn't worked on the article can't provide this input, so the FAC rumbles on until the opposes become so overwhelming that the article is failed, taking a lot of reviewers' time. While the Salvia divinorum‎ article is reasonable, you did not consult other contributors before nominating it, so I have archived it. I suggest you first work an article up through peer review and good article to prepare for WP:FAC. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 11:30, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

http://www.sonicstadium.org/board/topic/1347-sonic-sega-all-stars-racing/page__st__3760

Proposed deletion of Dan Forden

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Dan Forden has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. No significant coverage of the subject in independent reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Template:Tlc notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing Template:Tlc will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Terence7 (talk) 19:16, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Gamestation.jpg

⚠

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gamestation.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:42, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Earl and Edgar McGraw for deletion

File:Ambox warning orange.svg

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Earl and Edgar McGraw is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earl and Edgar McGraw until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Popcornduff (talk) 19:55, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dannychamp.jpg

⚠

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dannychamp.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:10, 5 October 2023 (UTC)