User talk:Alex Klotz
My poor grammar
Thank you very much for fixing my bad grammar -- I have yet to completely master it myself (even though I'm quite good at it). Thank you for making Wikipedia look more professional. —THIS IS MESSEDFile:R with umlaut.pngOCKER (TALK) 00:13, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
Physics Article WIP proposal
Hello, as an editor who has previously added to the Physics article and taken part in discussions on its talk page I thought a current proposal may be of interest to you. Over the past few months the article has suffered from a lack of focus and direction. Unfortunately the article is now judged by a number of editors to be in a relatively poor state. There is currently a proposal to start a full consensus based review of the article. That review and consensus process has been proposed here, your thoughts on the proposal and participation in the WIP review of the article would be much appreciated. It disappoints me that an article on one of the fundamental sciences here at wikipedia is in such a relatively poor state, and I hope you can have a browse by the page to offer your views and hopefully participate. Thanks, SFC9394 22:05, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks
I see you created the sherdog page. Kudos to you —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.58.187.94 (talk) 16:57, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
Did you really think this edit was a good idea? At best it's an unsourced, poor idea for an an edit and at worst it's vandalism. Was it really worth coming back from a 7 month hiatus from editing for that? VegaDark (talk) 07:58, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
Well, it is a common misconception.
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)