User talk:62.253.32.4
Nomination of Golems (Discworld) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Golems (Discworld) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golems (Discworld) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:30, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
The article Buglass has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NNAME, unnotable as both a surname and family. Entirely sourced to dictionaries, databases and websites of questionable reliability, i.e. nothing that shows notability, and goes into excess detail about random people who had the name in the 1500s.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Template:Tlc notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing Template:Tlc will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 05:41, 10 April 2024 (UTC)