User:Texture/Tab3

About Tεxτurε	Toolbox	Follow Up	Articles	Other Users		My talk page
User:Texture/tracking NPOV Engrish if it isn't deleted Create Kanoman sultanate, Djalaludin former sultan and Saladin (Kanoman) first son by commoner, Emirudin second son by royal blood. Correct POV if VfD fails to delete: List of war crimes Articles check Follow-up check Wikipedia check Talk page check Template:Delete check Watchlist check User:Texture/vandal articles Delete: User:Silsor/weirdmedia Create: cooper (profession) Bif Naked Revert wars: Schnorrer Unprotect and delete (per VfD vote) when vandalism stops: Shawn Mikula Spam articles: Spam Trapper for Outlook, Kelly Makin, Tom King (actor) , PC Atomic Sync, Spam Trapper Follow up: Design in Singapore, Shawn Mikula, Consciousness Singularity, Baseline consciousness, National Syndicalism, Neural coding, Expanded Consciousness, Neural Connectivity, Wikipolice Copyright in history: Pelion, Haren (North Brabant) Sadly deleted this image and quote: "Image:HeinrichHeine.jpg|right|100px|Where they burn books, they will end up burning people" REDIRECT Wikipedia:Community portal/Open tasks File:Clipboard.svg Here are some open Continental philosophy task force tasks: Add references to: Theodor W. Adorno Major overhaul: Critical Theory basic topics Semiotics Queer theory Expansion: A Thousand Plateaus Cyborg theory Queer Pedagogy Critical theory Critical race theory Jacques Derrida bibliography Notable figures in critical theory Psychoanalytic theory Mikhail Bakhtin List of works in critical theory Critical Discourse Analysis De-Stub: Barbara Herrnstein Smith French Theory Mary Louise Pratt Juan-David Nasio Peer Review Theodor W. Adorno Diegesis Third Generation of Critical Theory Axel Honneth Nancy Fraser Seyla Benhabib, etc. Economics Influence to Critical Theory Friedrich Pollock Critical Theory of IR and the GPE Improve article on neo-gramscianism and create new category for this field of critical theory Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks. User pages of interest or prior involvement: User:Adam Carr|(Talk) User:Ahoerstemeier|(Talk) User:Ambivalenthysteria|(Talk) User:Angela|(Talk) User:AndyL|(Talk) User:Bcorr|(Talk) User:Blankfaze|(Talk) User:Brockert|(Talk) User:Bryan Derksen|(Talk) User:Charles Matthews|(Talk) User:Chris 73|(Talk) User:Cribcage|(Talk) User:Cyrius|(Talk) User:Daniel C. Boyer|(Talk) User:David Gerard(Talk) User:Dori|(Talk) User:DropDeadGorgias|(Talk) User:Dwindrim|(Talk) User:Dysprosia|(Talk) User:Ed Poor|(Talk) User:Eloquence|(Talk) User:Evercat|(Talk) User:Everyking(Talk) User:Francs2000|(Talk) User:Frazzydee|(Talk) User:Fred Bauder|(Talk) User:GrazingshipIV|(Talk) User:Hephaestos|(Talk) User:Isomorphic|(Talk) User:Jerzy|(Talk) User:Jfdwolff|(Talk) User:Jimbo Wales|(Talk) User:Jondel(Talk) User:Jor|(Talk) - sockpuppet/insane user list Juuitchan|talk:Juuitchan User:Jwrosenzweig|(Talk) User:Kingturtle|(Talk) User:Lexor|(Talk) User:Mark Richards|(Talk) User:Maximus Rex|(Talk) User:Meelar(Talk) User:Mikkalai|(Talk) User:Morwen|(Talk) User:Muriel Gottrop|(Talk) User:Niteowlneils|Talk User:Orz|(Talk) User:Postdlf|(Talk) User:Raul654|(Talk) User:RickK|(Talk) User:Rmhermen|(Talk) User:Sam Spade|(Talk) User:Seth Ilys|(Talk) User:SimonP(Talk) User:Sj|(Talk) User:Snowspinner|(Talk) User:Solipsist(Talk) User:SqueakBox|(Talk) User:Tannin|(Talk) User:The Anome|(Talk) User:Theresa knott|(Talk) User:Topbanana|(Talk) User:TUF-KAT|(Talk) User:Vernon John De Duckmanton|(Talk) User:Wik|(Talk) User:Wile E. Heresiarch|(Talk) User:Zigger|(Talk) Nice page: User:Sj - nice topbar User:Angela/useful stuff Banned user Paul Vogel: User:66.185.84.80_ Songs: (link removed) Tim McGraw - Like you were dying No decision is final. Any admin can review a decision and take action allowed by the deletion policies. An incorrect decision can be reviewed if properly documented. Process allows for a review that deletes in this situation to be take to VfU. - Tεxτurε 14:57, 9 August 2005 (UTC) I agree. However Neutrality's stated objection is apparently that he personally considers 2:1 to be a rough consensus. This is simply a disagreement between parties that have different but reasonable (well, I consider the 2:1 standard to be just about defensible, though I would never use it myself) criteria for rough consensus. We can't go around tearing one another's legitimate closes down simply because our standards of consensus are different--surely there has to be some evidence of an illegitimate assumption or decision being made by the closer. --Tony SidawayTalk 15:20, 9 August 2005 (UTC)