User:Physchim62
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than Template:Th/abp Template:Th/abp may be automatically archived by [[User:Template:Th/abp|Template:Th/abp]]Expression error: Unrecognized punctuation character "[".. |
| Template:Senior Editor III |
One of the pleasures of being a Wikipedia editor is seeing the precision with which we illustrate the poetic hypothesis of the million monkeys. There really are a million editors, or a few million. We aren't trying to produce something as difficult as poetry, but on the other hand we aren't as polite as monkeys, so it evens out. Instead of each sitting quietly at our own keyboard blithely tapping out gibberish, we're all shrieking, constantly correcting each other, shoving each other around, biting our neighbor's fingers, frantically banging several keyboards as though one weren't enough, and generally getting a lot of exercise. Somehow out of all this comes a very large encyclopedia, and sometimes good in parts.
We like to think of ourselves as lone wolves, but really we've got all the fierce independence of a herd of sheep. When one of us puts "zip tie" as an alternate name in the Cable tie article, another has to add "tie wrap" and then comes "mouse belt" and "rat belt and every other pleasantly silly nickname a work crew invented on their lunch break.
One might think when we reporters get too silly, a sober editor would come in and crack down on us, but remember we aren't reporters; we are the editors and there isn't much of anyone to crack down on us except each other. It's kind of like a computer that has installed too many "security" programs downloaded from Internet and all of them hitting each other on the head instead of looking for real viruses, except it works better than an overly "secured" computer. There are a couple thousand "Admins" who have powers such as banning an editor and locking an article from tampering by newbie editors, but they operate more like policemen than like newspaper editors; they keep busy chasing genuinely malicious contributors and have little time to worry about incompetent ones, which is to say the majority.
And yet, it works. At least, often it works. The encyclopedia says much, seldom says things that aren't true, and sometimes says something intelligible; even useful.
User:Jim.henderson, 2008-05-31. Wikilinks by Physchim62.
ar:مستخدم:Physchim62 ca:Usuari:Physchim62 cs:Wikipedista:Physchim62 de:Benutzer:Physchim62 et:Kasutaja:Physchim62 es:Usuario:Physchim62 eo:Vikipediisto:Physchim62 fa:کاربر:Physchim62 fr:Utilisateur:Physchim62 he:משתמש:Physchim62 ko:사용자:Physchim62 id:Pengguna:Physchim62 is:Notandi:Physchim62 it:Utente:Physchim62 hu:User:Physchim62 mk:Корисник:Physchim62 ms:Pengguna:Physchim62 nl:Gebruiker:Physchim62 ja:利用者:Physchim62 nn:Brukar:Physchim62 pl:Wikipedysta:Physchim62 pt:Usuário:Physchim62 ro:Utilizator:Physchim62 ru:Участник:Physchim62 sk:Redaktor:Physchim62 sr:Корисник:Physchim62 fi:Käyttäjä:Physchim62 sv:Användare:Physchim62 uk:Користувач:Physchim62 zh:User:Physchim62