User:Edcolins

Bookmarks

Articles for deletion
- Polling is not a substitute for discussion
Copyright problems
List of common misspellings in English
Peer review
Perennial sources
Requested articles (law)
Request for comment
Template messages (inline)
- {{fact}}, {{citation needed}}, {{who}}
- {{who?}}, {{when}}, {{which?}}
- {{citations missing}} or {{refimprove}} or {{nofootnotes}}
- {{verify credibility}}
- {{primarysources}}
- {{peacock}}
- {{vague|optional mouseover message}}
- {{clarifyme|post-text=(complicatedjargon)}}
- {{recentism}}
- {{sofixit}}
- {{subst:unsigned|...ip address...}}
- {{reflist-talk}}
- User talk namespace
Third opinion
WP:RCATLIST–list of maintenance templates which are used to categorize redirect pages
Help:Linksearch (see Special:LinkSearch)
bullseye (to view information about IP addresses in a centralised location)

To do

Updating references that use Template:EPO Case law book 2019 to Template:EPO Case law book 2022.
Replacing references to "Case law of the EPO boards of appeal: a review by internal and external experts" (2011) with better sources, if available. Currently present in 7 articles: Inventive step under the EPC, Petition for review under the EPC, Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the EPO, Appeal procedure before the EPO, Novelty under the EPC, Software patents under the EPC, List of decisions of the EPO Boards of Appeal relating to Article 52(2) and (3) EPC
Updating Double patenting ("European Patent Convention" section)
Address reply on Talk:Seat (legal entity)

All in all, Wikipedia is a terrific, Borgesian project... I have been contributing since 2004, and I am a sysop, which " ... should be no big deal", according to Jimmy Wales. See also Wikipedia:Legal disclaimer.