Talk:Yes (band)

Moraz's contribution

File:Patric Moratz.jpg

Patrick Moraz

Template:Ping Template:Ping anonymous edit diff

Re: recent edits on Moraz's contribution:

This message turned out quite a bit longer than I intended. I looked into three sources: my copy of Close to the Edge: The Story of Yes (Welch, 2008 edition), All My Yesterdays (Howe, 2021), and this interview recorded by the website DMME.

I think we all love the work that Patrick Moraz did on Relayer! At the same time, we would do best (and give Moraz's work the most justice) to lean on what the sources have to say on the matter. On Relayer, a large portion of the writing work was already done before Moraz rehearsed and was selected to join the band. According to Howe:

Jon and I had written ‘To Be Over’ while ‘Sound Chaser’ and ‘The Gates Of Delirium’ were group compositions.

— Template:Comma separated entries

and Welch, describing the timeline of Moraz's additions to the album:

The group hastily recruited Patrick Moraz who stayed for three productive years...

— Template:Comma separated entries

Patrick finally made his decision and told Brian Lane he would be happy to join Yes. "I was always fascinated by their music and I thought they were brilliant. I went to the rehearsal and Brian Lane almost ran over me in his car! It was late, it was raining and he didn’t recognise me. He took me in his car to Rickmansworth and saw the very core of the band at work. They had already been preparing material for the Relayer album. When I heard them play ‘Sound Chaser’ I was blown away. It was unbelievable. They had already been there a couple of months so they had the best sound possible." Eddie Offord was there with a 24-track recording desk and Patrick’s contribution to ‘Sound Chaser’ was recorded that same day and ended up on the album.

— Template:Comma separated entries

In the DMME interview (I suspect it to be reliable, though should be used carefully in accordance with WP:USESPS), Moraz agrees his contributions were somewhat more limited in the album, but also claims he was uncredited for contributions to Going for the One:

[DMME:] “Relayer” is a great piece of work. But don’t you think that you weren’t given as much space as was Rick and the album is dominated by Steve Howe’s guitar?

[Moraz:] When we started to record “Relayer”, some of the music had already been written and rehearsed by Chris, Jon, Steve and Alan. I contributed as much as I could to the overall picture of the pieces. However, it is a fact that Steve used quite a lot of tracks for his many overdubs everywhere on the album, except when there is no guitar at all, which is a rare occasion.

[D:] All the tracks on the album are credited to all YES members. Who do you used to compose with and who you were close with the most?

[M:] We all participated in the compositions and the final arrangements, even if most of the “songs” were originally composed somewhat more by Jon, and Steve in some instances. I liked to work with Jon and Chris, especially. Alan was always contributing some very good rhythmic ideas. I also worked quite a lot with Steve during the whole time I was in YES.

[D:] You left YES while writing material for the upcoming “Going For The One” album. What was written before you left that ended up on the record?

[M:] We had written, together, quite a lot of the material which ended up on “Going For The One”, like “Awaken”, “Wondrous Stories” or even “Parallels” which were as much part my composition as anyone else in the band at that time. I also came up, during the two previous years prior to the recording of “Going For The One”, with a lot of ideas and contributions to the band and its sound. The fact that I was not credited as a writer of the songs, does not mean I did not compose for the group. As a member of the band, I composed as much as I could, as much as I was “allowed” to compose by the others.

[D:] Were you forced to leave or parting company was friendly?

[M:] Unfortunately, I was forced to leave....

— Template:Comma separated entries

Despite the apparently short timeline on the recording for "Sound Chaser" (see Welch above), multiple sources note Moraz's distinctive keyboard work and unique jazz influence on the sound, especially on "Sound Chaser" and "Gates of Delirium"; however, it is also described as being overshadowed in "fighting to be heard" over Howe's guitar tracks:

‘The Gates Of Delirium’, inspired by Tolstoy’s War And Peace, reaches a fever pitch of instrumental intensity in which Patrick Moraz fights to be heard amidst the dense layers of guitar tracks...

— Template:Comma separated entries

‘Sound Chaser’ contained some brilliant instrumental work and some of Chris Squire’s best bass work on record. Patrick Moraz also made his presence felt here. But the confused structure of the piece, with its changes in tempo and violent excesses, helps explain why Rick Wakeman didn’t want tobe [sic] involved.

— Template:Comma separated entries

For Howe's part, I find it telling that he seems to have more to say about Moraz's contributions to his solo album, Beginnings, than his contributions to Yes itself, in his autobiography (All My Yesterdays), devoting many more pages to the topic. In the Acknowledgments, speaking about the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame ceremony, he credits Moraz, in a list along with many others who “so deserved a mention on that night”, “for his amazing keyboards on Relayer.” (All my Yesterdays, p. 328). In the pages describing the development of Relayer, he specifically praises Moraz's stage presence: "“Live, he was a secret weapon, deployed to attack preconceptions, displace loyalties and perform as inspiringly as Vangelis might have done.” (p. 110). However, the most he says about Moraz's work for the Relayer recording itself is on "Sound Chaser": "The point where Patrick joins with the string chords really took some working out." (p. 112)

For Moraz's part, he describes his tenure with Yes in very fond terms, but also as somewhat of a learning experience (having already been a fan of the band before):

I saw Yes as a school. I recorded an album with them and did many tours, and really got into the way they arranged and composed their music. It gave me a deep insight into that kind of music. Yes music is vastly superior to any other group’s music I have heard...

— Template:Comma separated entries

Finally, ending with a couple of more minor mentions, here's Igor Khoroshev on Moraz's musical versatility:

"[Igor Khoroshev:] Wakeman is into synthesisers and piano, but Tony Kaye is into organ, while Patrick Moraz can do it all. That was his problem really. He should try not to solo so much on top of tunes like ‘Roundabout’. He plays like a non-stop machine! I love the guy but he’s constantly soloing!"

— Template:Comma separated entries

and Howe on his contributions to Going for the One and departure:

We began work with Patrick Moraz still on keyboards but after first two weeks he felt it wasn’t working. He wanted us to be a bit jazzier. ‘Nope, that’s never going to happen,’ we told him. We did make a big effort to get going again with him, before realising it was all over.”

— Template:Comma separated entries

Overall, it's clear that Moraz contributed somewhat to Relayer, and to a lesser extent, to Going for the One, even though his contributions aren't described in a way that I would interpret as being a major (or, say, majority) influence on the way either album turned out (that probably goes to Anderson and Howe, for Relayer). At the same time, that caps his overall contribution at, at most, significantly impacting one album and partially impacting another (and neither album that was quite as commercially successful as the previous Fragile era). Add to that the fact that Rock and Roll Hall of Fame chooses not to credit him for the big award, and the overall effect is that I'm not sure that's enough for him to be one of the "most notable members" of the band.

All that being said: I'm in favor of keeping the mention of him in the lead, when we say that he joins for Relayer. That is, I like best the version of the article after Tenebra Blue's edit here.

Did I miss anything from the other sources I didn't look at? Thoughts and input welcome! Thanks, Caleb Stanford (talk) 19:35, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi Caleb. Thank you for all that info. For my part i'm happy to leave Moraz out of the opening paragraph, although I think he deserves at least a mention somewhere in the lead, considering that Trevor Horn and Benoit David, both of whom were also only members for one studio album (not counting Horn's work as a producer), get a mention. I agree that Tenebra Blue's edit is probably the best compromise. Tbf62 (talk) 20:56, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

Template:Ping Thank you for documenting this information on Moraz's contributions. If it hasn't been done already, I encourage you to add some of these references and quotes to the Wikipedia pages to Patrick Moraz, Relayer, and Going for the One, where applicable. These articles are already comprehensive, but further context is often appreciated. Dobbyelf62 (talk) 21:48, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

Template:Ping Sounds good, thanks! Absolutely re: mentioning in lead.

Template:Ping Thanks! That is a much appreciated suggestion & I will see if I have time to do so! Caleb Stanford (talk) 22:59, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

I join in the thanks to Caleb. I simply made a minor edit as I did not find the previous anonymous edit to be incorrect. Although Relayer is one of the most appreciated Yes albums, I am not sure that Moraz can be counted among the most notable members. --Tenebra Blu (talk) 00:47, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

I fully agree with your conclusions. Honestly, I find it hard to defend mentioning Moraz as a most notable member and leaving Billy Sherwood out, considering that Sherwood has been working for the band in different positions for the last 35 years. I mean, I think it is hard to find objective reasons. Better the way it is now. Gorpik (talk) 07:19, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

I also think that Moraz does not warrant being mentioned in the opening paragraph. The opening paragraph currently mentions the 8 members who were on Union. They were all on multiple studio albums each. I think they are generally seen as the names most associated with Yes. If you are going to expand that list, there are arguments that Banks, Horn, Downes or Sherwood warrant inclusion before Moraz. (Downes and Sherwood do get mentioned later in the paragraph for being in the current line-up, which makes sense.) Bondegezou (talk) 10:44, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Article review

In September I reviewed this article and posted some observations. After reviewing the article today, I see that there are still lots of uncited statements, and the article is still quite large (at over 10,000 words). Should this article go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 15:53, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

I suggest continuing via WP:BRD instead; if you see something specific that needs improving… improve it. —Op\Shada\nG (talk | contribs) 02:24, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

Template:Re I have neither the time nor expertise to fix up this article. I am happy to re-review if improvements are made. Z1720 (talk) 04:02, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

You do that. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ —Op\Shada\nG (talk | contribs) 22:11, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

Template:Re Maybe you should go do Admin stuff somewhere else. - FlightTime (open channel) 22:14, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

Template:Re I'm not sure what is meant by "admin stuff": article reviews are not an admin action and anyone can undertake them (or address the issues raised). If this is in reference to how I spend my wikitime, then I would like to point out that Wikipedia is a volunteer service and editors can choose where they spend their time. Concerns about my reviews can be posted at WT:GAN, on my talk page, or in the appropriate noticeboard. Z1720 (talk) 22:44, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

OMG, stright out of the Admin handbook :P. - FlightTime (open channel) 01:58, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Seems like time isn't such as issue after all. —Op\Shada\nG (talk | contribs) 02:37, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Lead image

File:Placeholder view vector.svg

See proposed lead image

File:Yes concert.jpg

The current lead image

I boldly changed the article's lead image to this photograph of the Union octet lineup in 1991, moving the current 1977 photo to the article body. I anticipated there could be pushback, and it was quickly reverted by User:FlightTime. Now I take the discussion here to see if editors can reach consensus on whether this would be a worthwhile change.

This is how it would look in practice

My justification for using this image is as follows: it displays, in one photo at the top of the page, the most notable members of the band who are also listed in the lead. It includes all the musicians that played on the band's most successful singles, and the members that were inducted into the Hall of Fame in 2017. The only information that is lost from removing the current image in the lead is how the band looked performing in the 70s, but I believe this is made up for by the added clarity of the 1991 image which features all the same band members, along with Rabin and Kaye from their successful 80s era and Bruford (+ Kaye) from their earlier years. I see this as a better depiction of the important people that made up the band through the years, and it is convenient for readers to be able to see the most notable members in one place. I also dislike how the 1977 image is engulfed in shadow and doesn't show any of the members' faces well.

As an example of this practice, using a fair use image to illustrate more band members in the infobox than would otherwise be possible has already been used to good effect in Pink Floyd's article since 2009. Any of your thoughts are appreciated! Miklogfeather (talk) 18:22, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

Agree. Union-era image is more informative in that context. Keeping the classic era live photo prominently in the article is good too. Curious to hear any arguments against. —Op\Shada\nG (talk | contribs) 20:37, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

I agree also. With 3 votes in favor I think this can be considered a tentative consensus to use Union (agree keeping the current lead image in the body or underneath the header also). Caleb Stanford (talk) 20:40, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

Agree. Is it possible to upload the image to Wikimedia Commons for use on other wikis? --Tenebra Blu (talk) 10:23, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

I’m not certain what policy is relevant here, but I too prefer the Union image. Bondegezou (talk) 11:35, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

I also believe that the Union photo would work well. Dobbyelf62 (talk) 11:58, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Just to contribute to the consensus, I also agree with the image change. Gorpik (talk) 09:08, 16 June 2025 (UTC)