Talk:World Series
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the World Series Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
| Template:Search box |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "Message box". Script error: No such module "Banner shell". User:MiszaBot/config User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
Krakatoa?
I don't want to open up discussion about the name of this competition yet again, but surely there is a better source for the 'New York World' argument than a book about volcanoes, written by somebody we can assume to have no specific baseball knowledge, over a century after the naming took place? Even the reference set up as the counter-example concedes that it's mentioned on several baseball blogs. Needs a source who knows home plates, not tectonic plates!
If there isn't a reputable source for the New York World argument, it damages its credibility to the point it might be worth considering rephrasing the current text, which currently implies the New York World hypothesis is the more likely explanation. Dybeck (talk) 16:51, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
